This study proposes SURE (A Safe and Unified AI Framework foR Everyone), which is designed as a framework for customizing the attributes of AI safety and ensuring the defined AI safety.
Abstract
Warning: This paper contains harmful and offensive text. Recently, large language models such as GPT-4, and Claude have revolutionized tasks in various domains. As the use of these large language models increases, people are increasingly concerned about AI safety and demand that large language models behave responsibly and safely. As a result, there has been growing global interest in developing methods to ensure AI safety. However, the detailed criteria for AI safety may vary depending on the country, culture, and policies of the company you serve. In this study, we propose SURE (A Safe and Unified AI Framework foR Everyone), which is designed as a framework for customizing the attributes of AI safety and ensuring the defined AI safety. Within SURE, we establish taxonomies for adversarial prompts that could threaten AI safety and construct prompts based on the taxonomies. We then define templates for desirable AI responses to these prompts and design an absolute safety scoring scheme. Finally, we conduct AI alignment using the datasets to gradually ensure AI safety. The effectiveness of SURE is demonstrated through experiments with various base models.
A Domain-Specific Adversarial Prompt (DSAP) dataset of 4,240 prompts aimed at testing safety boundaries of LLMs focusing on indirect adversarial prompts in the context of realistic professional settings is presented and novel information regarding the weaknesses of contemporary language models is provided.
Gaurang Mishra, Shikha Maheshwari· Natural Resources for Human...· 0 citations
EADC, a novel advanced evaluation benchmark of LLMs based on an AI compliance knowledge graph and AI compliance legal experts, is introduced, offering a rigorous, AI laws and regulations-aligned benchmark to safeguard high-level and deep compliance in the application of LLMs.
Yan Zhang, Rui-En Li, Yao-Yao Peng et al.· 0 citations
EvoSafeHarness is a safety-specific optimization framework that synthesizes a deployable harness for a frozen model in a target domain, guided by model behavior, domain specifications, and fresh-context adversarial review to reject benchmark-specific rules.
Nanxi Li, Ying-Zi Ma, Yu-Long Cao et al.· 4 citations· ⚡1
Summary Safety for large language models (LLMs) and artificial intelligence (AI) agents remains fragmented; defenses against jailbreaking coexist with unresolved hallucination, fairness, and autonomous-control problems. Existing frameworks address these risks, but few specify how failure in one dimension changes anothe...
The threat that ordinary non-technical users pose to large language models (LLMs) still sits at the margins of AI-security research. These are people who work with AI assistants every day — at work, in study, in everyday life — yet hold no specialised background in information technology or machine learning. A post-lab...
A. Sokolov, Gleb Sokolov· Issues of Media Business· 0 citations
Experiments show that Cunning training improves robustness to out-of-distribution jailbreak attacks and strengthens subsequent safety fine-tuning, and suggest that cunning data can strengthen model vigilance and complement conventional safety alignment.
You-Jia Wang, Lin Xu, Yang Sun et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.