Skip to content
Preprint

SURE: Framework for Safety to Construct Trustworthy AI

Sep 2026 · 0 citations · 15 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

This study proposes SURE (A Safe and Unified AI Framework foR Everyone), which is designed as a framework for customizing the attributes of AI safety and ensuring the defined AI safety.

Abstract

Warning: This paper contains harmful and offensive text. Recently, large language models such as GPT-4, and Claude have revolutionized tasks in various domains. As the use of these large language models increases, people are increasingly concerned about AI safety and demand that large language models behave responsibly and safely. As a result, there has been growing global interest in developing methods to ensure AI safety. However, the detailed criteria for AI safety may vary depending on the country, culture, and policies of the company you serve. In this study, we propose SURE (A Safe and Unified AI Framework foR Everyone), which is designed as a framework for customizing the attributes of AI safety and ensuring the defined AI safety. Within SURE, we establish taxonomies for adversarial prompts that could threaten AI safety and construct prompts based on the taxonomies. We then define templates for desirable AI responses to these prompts and design an absolute safety scoring scheme. Finally, we conduct AI alignment using the datasets to gradually ensure AI safety. The effectiveness of SURE is demonstrated through experiments with various base models.

View source

Similar papers

Sep 2026

DSAP Bench: Evaluating Safety Boundary Erosion in Large Language Models using Domain-Specific Adversarial Prompts

A Domain-Specific Adversarial Prompt (DSAP) dataset of 4,240 prompts aimed at testing safety boundaries of LLMs focusing on indirect adversarial prompts in the context of realistic professional settings is presented and novel information regarding the weaknesses of contemporary language models is provided.

Gaurang Mishra, Shikha Maheshwari · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Review Sep 2026

EADC: Evaluation of Advanced and Deep-level Compliance in Large Language Models

EADC, a novel advanced evaluation benchmark of LLMs based on an AI compliance knowledge graph and AI compliance legal experts, is introduced, offering a rigorous, AI laws and regulations-aligned benchmark to safeguard high-level and deep compliance in the application of LLMs.

Yan Zhang, Rui-En Li, Yao-Yao Peng et al. · 0 citations
Review Sep 2026

EvoSafeHarness: Evolving Model- and Domain-Specific Harnesses for Securing Agents

EvoSafeHarness is a safety-specific optimization framework that synthesizes a deployable harness for a frozen model in a target domain, guided by model behavior, domain specifications, and fresh-context adversarial review to reject benchmark-specific rules.

Nanxi Li, Ying-Zi Ma, Yu-Long Cao et al. · 4 citations · ⚡1
Review Open access Sep 2026

AI safety is a system property, not a sum of individual defenses

Summary Safety for large language models (LLMs) and artificial intelligence (AI) agents remains fragmented; defenses against jailbreaking coexist with unresolved hallucination, fairness, and autonomous-control problems. Existing frameworks address these risks, but few specify how failure in one dimension changes anothe...

Xiang Chen, ,-Chen-Xiao Lin, Long-Long Zhu et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Oct 2026

The Non-Technical User as an LLM Threat Vector: Linguistic Strategies for Bypassing AI Safeguards and Implications for AI Security

The threat that ordinary non-technical users pose to large language models (LLMs) still sits at the margins of AI-security research. These are people who work with AI assistants every day — at work, in study, in everyday life — yet hold no specialised background in information technology or machine learning. A post-lab...

A. Sokolov, Gleb Sokolov · 0 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Beyond Routine Compliance: Cunning Data Cultivates Safety Vigilance in Large Language Models

Experiments show that Cunning training improves robustness to out-of-distribution jailbreak attacks and strengthens subsequent safety fine-tuning, and suggest that cunning data can strengthen model vigilance and complement conventional safety alignment.

You-Jia Wang, Lin Xu, Yang Sun et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.