Skip to content

EGFR Targeting With Afatinib and Cetuximab Versus Cetuximab Alone in Chemorefractory Wild-type RAS Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Phase II Study With Circulating Tumor Cell Analysis.

Sep 2026 · Clinical colorectal cancer · 0 citations · 14 references
Medicine

TL;DR

The combination of afatinib and cetuximab was ineffective in treating chemorefractory wtRAS mCRC, and associated with high toxicity, and associated with high toxicity.

Abstract

Purpose

This phase II randomized trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of the combination of cetuximab and afatinib in chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

Methods

We conducted a multicentre, open-label, randomized 2/1 noncomparative clinical trial in 75 patients with wild type (wt) RAS mCRC after chemotherapy failure. Patients (n = 51) received oral afatinib (40 mg/d) in combination with intravenous cetuximab (500 mg/m2 every 2 weeks) or cetuximab alone (n = 24) as an internal control arm. Crossover to afatinib was allowed after disease progression. The primary endpoint was the 6-month nonprogression rate with a minimal success rate of 30%. The prognostic value of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) was assessed in an ancillary analysis.

Results

In the combination arm, 9 patients (18%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 8-31), were progression-free at 6 months (primary endpoint not met). The objective response rate (ORR) was 26% (95% CI, 14-40). Median PFS and overall survival (OS) were 4.1 months (95% CI, 2.7-5.4) and 13.6 months (95% CI, 7.7-18.5) respectively. Thirty-seven patients (76%) in the combination arm and 16 patients (64%) in the control arm reported at least one severe (grade ≥ 3) toxicity. Two patients in the combination arm had grade 5 toxicity (sudden death and hypoglycemia). High baseline CTC levels and their decrease at day 14 were correlated to OS and ORR. CTC levels at day 14 were correlated to PFS.

Conclusion

The combination of afatinib and cetuximab was ineffective in treating chemorefractory wtRAS mCRC, and associated with high toxicity.

View source

Similar papers

Clinical trial Open access Sep 2026

First-line anlotinib versus bevacizumab plus CapeOX in RAS/BRAF wild-type unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (ANCHOR): a multicenter, prospective, randomized, phase 3 trial

Bevacizumab plus chemotherapy is the standard first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). To date, no phase 3 trial has compared first-line oral multitargeted TKI versus bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in RAS/BRAF wild-type mCRC. The open-label, noninferiority, randomized, phase 3 trial (ANCHOR; NCT048546...

Yue Liu, Yan-Qiao Zhang, Rongbo Lin et al. · 0 citations
Clinical trial Open access Sep 2026

Induction and concurrent aumolertinib with radiotherapy for EGFR-mutated stage III NSCLC: results of phase III ADVANCE trial and real-world validation

The phase III ADVANCE study prospectively assessed a chemotherapy-free strategy combining aumolertinib with definitive radiotherapy (RT) in patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations (ChiCTR.org: ChiCTR2000040590). Participants wer...

N. Bi, Jian-Yang Wang, Wei Jiang et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Oct 2026

Combination of oral fluoropyrimidines and EGFR-directed antibodies in frail patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review

Evidence of treatment strategies in frail patients (i.e. not fit for combination therapies) with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is limited to dose-reduced doublet regimens or oral fluoropyrimidines (FP) with bevacizumab. We conducted a systematic review analyzing evidence for oral FPs with epidermal g...

A. A. Hasenburg, S. Stintzing, A. Stahler · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Amivantamab plus chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy in participants with EGFR-mutant advanced non-small cell lung cancer after progression on osimertinib: a MARIPOSA-2 analysis of the Asian subgroup

Amivantamab-chemotherapy provides an effective option for patients whose disease had progressed on third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors and is presented as an effective option for patients whose disease had progressed on osimertinib monotherapy.

J.-Y. Shih, Jie Wang, Yong-Sheng Wang et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Efficacy and safety of liposomal irinotecan plus nimotuzumab in immune checkpoint inhibitor-refractory recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a single-arm, open-label, phase II trial

Summary Background Patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (R/M NPC) who progress after immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy have limited treatment options and poor outcomes. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of liposomal irinotecan plus nimotuzumab in patients with epidermal growth facto...

Shui-Qing He, Wei-Xin Bei, Nian Lu et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Efficacy of Lenvatinib versus Bevacizumab in Triple Therapy with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Interventional Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Macrovascular Invasion: A Multi-Center Real-World Retrospective Study

Background Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with macrovascular invasion (MaVI) continue to experience a dismal prognosis and the optimal drug combination choices remain undefined. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of lenvatinib-based triple therapy versus bevacizumab-based tri...

Jia-Zhi Zhang, Yong-Fa Liu, Yi Ding et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.