Skip to content
Open access

A comparative study of platelet-rich plasma versus corticosteroid injections in the management of partial thickness rotator cuff tears

Aug 2026 · International Journal of Research in Orthopaedics · 0 citations · 12 references

Abstract

Background: Rotator cuff disease (RCD) affects over 60% of individuals above 80 years. Partial thickness rotator cuff tears (PTRCTs) cause persistent pain and functional limitation. Corticosteroid injections provide short-term relief but risk tendon degeneration. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP), enriched with TGF-β, VEGF, PDGF and EGF, promotes tendon regeneration and may offer durable benefit. Methods: Prospective comparative study over 20 months (June 2023–February 2025). Forty-four patients (22 per group) with USG/MRI-confirmed PTRCTs were assigned to Group A (corticosteroid: triamcinolone acetonide 40 mg) or Group B (autologous PRP via MyCells System). Outcomes assessed using VAS (pain), ASES score (function) and shoulder goniometry at 4, 8 and 12 weeks. Chi-square test used; p<0.05 considered significant Results: Both groups had moderate pain at 4 weeks. At 8 weeks, 36.4% of PRP patients improved to mild pain; all corticosteroid patients retained moderate pain. At 12 weeks, 100% of PRP patients had mild pain versus 63.6% moderate and 36.4% severe in the corticosteroid group (p<0.001). ASES score was 'better' in 100% of PRP patients versus 'good' in corticosteroid patients (p<0.001). USG confirmed tendon regeneration in 100% of PRP patients; persistent tear was noted in 100% of corticosteroid patients. Conclusions: PRP is superior to corticosteroids for PTRCTs, offering better long-term pain relief, functional outcomes and sonographic tendon regeneration. PRP should be considered a preferred regenerative treatment for partial thickness rotator cuff tears.

Read PDF

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.