Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of implementing HPV vaccination in Turkiye's National Immunization Program using the PRIME model.
TL;DR
Findings from this analysis support the inclusion of HPV vaccination within the National Immunization Program (NIP) as a cost-effective public health strategy capable of reducing the burden of cervical cancer.
Abstract
Objectives
HPV vaccines have been proven effective against genital warts and various cancers, including cervical, anal, penile, vulvar, vaginal, and oropharyngeal cancers. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of including the 9-valent HPV vaccine in the Turkish National Immunization Program (NIP). MATERIAL AND
Methods
The Papillomavirus Rapid Interface for Modeling and Economics (PRIME) framework was applied to project the potential financial and societal outcomes of introducing HPV vaccination into Türkiye's 2024 national immunization schedule. Demographic data were obtained from the Turkish Statistical Institute (TUIK, Turkiye Istatistik Kurumu). The cost of vaccine was gathered from Ministry of Health. Epidemiologic inputs, treatment expenditure data, and additional modeling parameters were derived from previously published research sources. Model outputs included projected vaccination expenses, savings from avoided treatment, net costs, prevented cases and deaths, gained life-years, averted disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs), and estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. Potential variability in model projections was examined through deterministic sensitivity testing.
Results
At the national level, with the 9-valent HPV vaccination of a single age cohort in the base year, an estimated 772 cervical cancer cases and 369 related deaths could be avoided through implementation of the vaccination program. With an estimated US$13,754 per DALY gained, the 9-valent HPV vaccine fell within the acceptable cost-effectiveness threshold, defined as three times the GDP per capita. Sensitivity testing confirmed consistent outcomes across parameter variations, identifying the discount rate as the major driver influencing baseline estimates.
Conclusions
Findings from this analysis support the inclusion of HPV vaccination within the National Immunization Program (NIP) as a cost-effective public health strategy capable of reducing the burden of cervical cancer. Even when considering only cervical cancer, HPV vaccination proves to be cost-effective; when benefits against genital warts and other HPV-related cancers are included, the overall impact increases significantly.