Oct 2026· Annaly khirurgicheskoy gepatologii = Annals of HPB surgery· 0 citations· 7 references
TL;DR
The implementation stage of robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenal resection has already demonstrated a positive trend, including a reduction in the number of wound complications, the incidence of pancreatic fistulas, and the length of hospital stay, as well as an increase in the rate of achieving the target outcome.
Abstract
Aim.
To evaluate the short-term outcomes of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy during the implementation stage compared with open pancreatoduodenal resection.
Material and methods.
A single-center, retrospective cohort study was conducted. The study analyzed the outcomes of 114 open and 52 robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy procedures performed between 2017 and 2025. To reduce the risk of systematic error, Propensity Score Matching (PSM) was performed.
Results.
The majority of the measured parameters were comparable. The median operative time in the robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy group was significantly longer both before and after PSM (
p =
0.013). No statistically significant differences were observed in the incidence of postoperative complications classified as Clavien-Dindo ≥3, the median cumulative complication index, or in-hospital mortality. Prior to PSM, the robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy group exhibited a significantly lower incidence of wound complications (3.8 % vs. 14 %). However, after PSM, the differences were not statistically significant (
p =
0.141). The results of the PSM procedure indicated a lower incidence of pancreatic fistula in the robotic-assisted pancreas surgery group (25 % vs. 33.3 %;
p =
0.071). Following PSM, the in-hospital mortality ratewas recorded as 4.9 % and 7.6 %, respectively (
p =
0.169). In the group that underwent robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy, four deaths occurred among the initial 30 surgeries. Subsequent mortality was not observed.
Conclusion.
After performing more than 50 robotic pancreatoduodenectomy procedures, satisfactory results comparable to those of open surgery were achieved. Moreover, the implementation stage of robot-assisted pancreaticoduodenal resection has already demonstrated a positive trend, including a reduction in the number of wound complications, the incidence of pancreatic fistulas, and the length of hospital stay, as well as an increase in the rate of achieving the target outcome.
Over the study period, OPD declined while MIPD adoption increased substantially, driven primarily by rapid growth in RPD, which may reflect increasing institutional experience and maturation of the technique.
L. Foroutani, Allison Chang, Architha Kannan et al.· Surgical Endoscopy· 0 citations
Abstract Background Minimally invasive approaches to pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) are increasingly being adopted worldwide. However, direct comparisons between laparoscopic PD (LPD) and robot-assisted PD (RPD) remain limited and inconclusive. This study aimed to compare perioperative outcomes between LPD and RPD within a...
G. Quero, R. Menghi, N. Napoli et al.· BJS Open· 0 citations
LRP can be safely adopted during the learning curve without compromising early oncological or functional outcomes, as well as surgical, tumor-related, and functional outcomes during the adaptation period.
Y. Aydın, Yiğit Atasoy, R. Girgin et al.· Medical Journal of Western B...· 0 citations
Aim: The aim of the present study was to compare thoracolaparoscopic MIE and OE in a single-center cohort including both benign and malignant esophageal diseases, with emphasis on perioperative outcomes, postoperative complications, early mortality, and adjusted predictors of overall postoperative morbidity.
Materials...
K. Kanatov, A. Shokebaev, N. Imammyrzayev et al.· Bulletin of Surgery of Kazak...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.