Importance
Variation in hospice use for patients with cancer exists between palliative care programs, but factors underlying this heterogeneity are unknown.
Objective
To identify hospital and palliative care program factors that may impact the ability of palliative care teams to affect hospice use in cancer.
Design, Setting, and Participants
This multicenter qualitative study included 6 palliative care programs in the United States. Using a cohort of patients with metastatic cancer who received specialist palliative care, a positive-negative deviance approach was used to select 3 programs with high and 3 programs with low performance on hospice use. In-depth site visits were conducted and included semistructured interviews with palliative care and oncology clinicians and patients as well as in-person observation. Interviews were conducted from February 2025 to January 2026. Site visits were conducted from May 2025 to January 2026.
Main Outcomes and Measures
Program-specific practices and their potential effect on hospice use for patients with cancer.
Results
A total of 93 interviews and 424 hours of in-person observation were conducted across 6 palliative care programs in the Midwest, Upper South, and Deep South regions of the United States. Interview participants had a median (IQR) age of 43 (37-47) years; 68 (73.1%) were female; clinicians had a median (IQR) of 11 (5-16) years of experience. There were notable differences in the relationships between palliative care and oncology teams between high- and low-performing programs. At high-performing programs, the relationship was characterized by mutual trust and respect, warmth and familiarity, and empathy for each other, whereas at low-performing programs, the relationship was characterized by a lack of trust and familiarity and negative regard for each other. Factors observed in programs with positive relationships included intentionality in relationship building, physical presence and proximity between teams, use of real-time communication, and the palliative care team having a service-oriented mentality and a reputation for reliable service. At high-performing programs, observable differences in care included collaborative care delivery, increased access and timeliness of palliative care, and earlier introduction of hospice by oncology clinicians.
Conclusions and Relevance
In this multicenter qualitative study, differences in the relationship between palliative care and oncology teams were identified that may mechanistically affect end-of-life patient outcomes. These findings are important to ensure the delivery of high-quality care for all patients with cancer.
IntroductionHospitalized patients with advanced cancer frequently experience high symptom burden, prognostic uncertainty, and complex decision-making needs. Although specialty palliative care improves patient-centered outcomes, access remains limited in many inpatient settings. Oncology hospitalists may be uniquely pos...
Rahul Mittal, Augustus Chang, Ameish Govindarajan et al.· Cancer Control: Journal of t...· 0 citations
319
Background:
Specialized palliative care integrated into oncology has demonstrated improved patient outcomes by managing physical and mental symptoms for patients with cancer. However, the objective impact of this approach in a community practice has been incompletely characterized. We sought differences in...
A statewide oncology-focused primary palliative care training program is feasible, successful and well received among clinicians and may expand primary palliative care capacity, particularly in underserved areas.
Natalia Simon, Stephanie Leung, Kelly Devries et al.· JCO Oncology Practice· 0 citations
INTRODUCTION
Timely initiation of hospice-palliative care may improve the quality of life of patients with advanced, incurable disease, support family caregivers, and reduce the use of disproportionate hospital care. In Hungary, however, access to care and the organization of patient pathways may face several challenge...
Ákos Horváth-Karacs, Szilvia Kassai· Orvosi Hetilap· 0 citations
BackgroundCommunity-based palliative care is increasingly promoted as an alternative to hospital-centered end-of-life care, yet prior reviews have largely cataloged outcome measures or program components associated with favorable results, without explaining how these components interact to produce those outcomes.Object...
BACKGROUND
There is limited evidence to guide implementation of recommended collaborative palliative care (PC) models for hospitalized patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We sought to characterize palliative needs and identify barriers to PC delivery to inform inpatient collaborative care models...
N. Smirnova, T. Klaiman, Taylor L. Stallings et al.· Respiratory Medicine· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.