UAV-Assisted MOSI/SOMI MIMO-FSO Relay for Resilient Transport Communication Links

Abstract

Reliable communication infrastructure is a fundamental component of Intelligent Transport Systems (ITSs), particularly in scenarios involving maritime corridors and emergency traffic management. In locations where optical fiber deployment is geographically constrained, unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-assisted free-space optical (FSO) relay links provide a flexible and rapidly deployable alternative. However, atmospheric attenuation, turbulence-induced fading, and wind-induced UAV misalignment can severely degrade link reliability and disrupt real-time transport data streams. This study proposes a payload-efficient multiple-input multiple-output free-space optical (MIMO-FSO) relay architecture based on a multi-output/single-input (MOSI) uplink and a single-output/multi-input (SOMI) downlink. Here, MOSI denotes multiple ground-based transmit apertures directed toward a single UAV receiving aperture, whereas SOMI denotes one UAV transmitting aperture serving multiple ground-based receiving apertures. Unlike conventional symmetric UAV-assisted MIMO-FSO relays that may duplicate diversity hardware on the aerial node, the proposed design shifts the parallel optical branches to the ground stations and keeps only one optical receiver and one optical transmitter on board the UAV. Under the adopted 4 × 4 comparison assumption, this reduces the UAV-side optical branch count from eight to two, corresponding to a 75% branch-count reduction proxy. System performance is evaluated over a 1.54 km relay link. The analytical framework describes Beer–Lambert attenuation, log-normal/gamma–gamma turbulence, and statistical pointing errors; in the OptiSystem implementation, their combined effects are represented by equivalent aggregate losses of 25 dB/km for atmospheric absorption/scattering and 25.5 dB/km for turbulence- and pointing-related degradation. Comparative simulations for SISO, 2 × 2, and 4 × 4 configurations show that the proposed 4 × 4 architecture increases the Q-factor from 8.38 to 18.25 and changes the OptiSystem-reported minimum BER from 2.73 × 10−17 to 9.95 × 10−75. Because a finite simulation cannot statistically validate error probabilities of this magnitude through raw error counting, values far below 10−12 are interpreted primarily as comparative indicators of receiver decision margin. The findings provide simulation-based evidence that the proposed architecture is a scalable candidate for resilient optical wireless backhaul in smart transport corridors under adverse propagation conditions.