DiaLLM is introduced, which continually pretrains three open-weight language model families on the International Corpus of English and applies implicit and explicit post-training paradigms, each combined with three model alignment strategies, giving the first controlled comparison of these components across Australian, Indian, and Northern British English.
Abstract
Large language models increasingly understand dialectal English, yet still produce only standard, US-leaning English, leaving dialectal generation, the harder half of the problem, largely unaddressed. We introduce DiaLLM, which continually pretrains three open-weight language model families on the International Corpus of English and applies implicit and explicit post-training paradigms, each combined with three model alignment strategies, giving the first controlled comparison of these components across Australian, Indian, and Northern British English. Our results reveal a robustness-generation gap: benchmarks are shaped by continual pretraining and SFT, while alignment visibly reshapes generation in ways benchmarks do not capture. Explicit variety-targeted adaptation produces output reliably recognised as dialectal and judged more dialectal than broad alignment, yet where human judgement was directly assessed, the method that most aggressively optimises the dialectal reward is not the one judged most dialectal. Independent linguistic analysis corroborates this reward-quality gap, most clearly on two of the three families. No single alignment method dominates, and closing the gap will require richer reward designs and continued investment in dialectal resources. We release all code, checkpoints, and preference datasets.
Large Language Models (LLMs) are typically evaluated on standard written Vietnamese, yet everyday communication frequently involves regional dialects that preserve meaning but differ in surface form. Existing Vietnamese dialect work largely addresses this issue through dialect-to-standard normalization instead of measuring how the model fails under Vietnamese dialectal inputs. To address this gap, we present the first systematic evaluation of LLM robustness to Vietnamese dialect variation across multiple tasks, quantifying performance degradation and failure patterns. We introduce VialectBench (Vietnamese Dialects Benchmarking), a controlled benchmark for testing whether model decisions remain stable across six Vietnamese dialect groups. VialectBench contains 400 Standard Vietnamese source instances and 2,400 human-written dialectal rewrites spanning emotion recognition (ER), natural language inference (NLI), question answering (QA), and multiple-choice question answering (MCQA). Dataset evaluation with a fixed reference language model shows that the dialectal rewrites induce a measurable model-relative likelihood shift while remaining nearly equal in length to their Standard counterparts. Across ten instruction-tuned models, dialectal inputs reduce average performance by 2.82%, and no evaluated model is fully dialect-invariant. All four tasks are affected, with QA showing the largest average degradation. Robustness also varies substantially across dialect groups: PNT3 and PNT2 cause the largest average performance drops, at 6.17% and 4.73%, respectively, whereas PNB slightly improves average performance by 0.42%. The Central dialect group (PNT1-PNT4) also yields the highest average harmful-flip rate across all models, at 6.54%. These findings show that strong performance on Standard Vietnamese does not guarantee reliable behavior under meaning-preserving regional variation.
Systematic dialectal performance gaps in language models (LMs) are well documented, but the source of these disparities within the modern language modeling pipeline remains unclear. Our study traces this"dialect tax"across the natural language processing pipeline. Using parallel English dialect corpora that hold meaning fixed while varying surface form, we first confirm that LMs recognize matched Standard American English (SAE) and dialectal texts as semantically equivalent. However, we discover further representational gaps corresponding to downstream performance gaps. Across model families and generations, modern LMs still encode dialectal texts unequally during tokenization, pre-training, post-training, and inference. Strikingly, bypassing traditional subword segmentation via a character-level counterfactual tokenizer removes neither input and output asymmetries nor dialectal accuracy gaps. During pre-training, dialect pairs induce more divergent gradient updates than pairs of entirely unrelated SAE documents, indicating that models find semantically equivalent dialectal content harder to learn from than unrelated SAE documents. During post-training, reward models show contextual, unstable dialect preferences, assigning higher values to isolated AAVE-exclusive tokens than to SAE-exclusive tokens, while full reasoning contexts receive task- and model-dependent dialect penalties. Overall, our findings suggest that the dialect tax is encoded and accumulated not by any one step in isolation, but at every step of the language modeling process.
Elle Michelle Yang, Mark Chen, Jerry Tworek et al.· 0 citations
J-PragEval-v0 is introduced, a minimal-pair benchmark isolating four such phenomena from surface fluency, and Pragmatic Representation Steering is specified, a parameter-free inference-time method that edits residual-stream activations along the class-mean-difference directions probing identifies.
The Cross-Lingual Comprehension Gap (CLCG) is defined as the reduction in response quality when the same content and question are presented in a target language rather than in English.
Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable progress across natural language processing (NLP) tasks, yet their capabilities degrade sharply for low-resource languages and dialectally diverse settings. Bangla, the world's sixth most spoken language, exemplifies this gap: existing resources overwhelmingly target Standard Bangla, leaving its regional dialects without the benchmarks needed to develop or evaluate dialect-aware systems. We address this gap with 5-Dialects-BN, the first multi-annotation Bangla dialect benchmark to align Romanized transliteration with dialectal text, Standard Bangla, English, and subjectivity labels across five regional varieties. The dataset comprises 6,000 manually annotated entries spanning five major dialects: Chittagong, Barisal, Noakhali, Sylhet, and Rangpur (Chittagong 1,900; Noakhali 1,500; Sylhet 1,200; Barisal 700; Rangpur 700), reflecting natural online availability. Each entry is enriched with five aligned annotations: the original dialectal text, a Romanized transliteration, an English translation, a Standard Bangla translation, and a subjectivity label (subjective vs. objective). Annotations were produced and cross-validated by native speakers and undergraduate linguistics students to ensure dialectal authenticity and semantic fidelity. The resulting resource supports a diverse suite of tasks, including dialect identification, dialect-to-standard normalization, machine translation, subjectivity classification, and parameter-efficient fine-tuning (e.g., LoRA) of multilingual LLMs. By providing a standardized, multi-annotation benchmark, 5-Dialects-BN enables principled evaluation of LLMs on dialectally diverse Bangla and lays a foundation for further research in low-resource, dialect-aware NLP.
Md Mahir Jawad, Galib Mahmud Jim, Rafid Ahmed et al.· 0 citations
A new method, called CW-Net, translates the reasoning process of an autonomous vehicle’s AI system into understandable concepts that explain its behavior.
MIT News · Artificial Intelligence· news.mit.eduAug 31, 2026
With millions of users across the world, Julia has been used to conduct cutting-edge research and to design new drugs, jet engines, heat pumps, and more.
A new machine-learning framework aims to improve the success rate of computational protein design while moving away from results that reproduce sequences found in nature.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.
