Skip to content
Open access

Texts Generated by Artificial Intelligence: Structure and Semantics

Jul 2026 · Computer and Decision Making: An International Journal · 0 citations

TL;DR

It was concluded that texts generated by artificial intelligence constitute a separate linguistic phenomenon with its own set of characteristics, which requires a special typology and a flexible, updatable analysis methodology.

Abstract

The article describes texts generated by artificial intelligence, with an emphasis on Ukrainian-language material, which remains understudied. The aim of the study was to identify specific identifying characteristics of AI texts by comparing their semantic, structural, and stylistic parameters with texts written by humans. The study combined systematic analysis and synthesis, a comparative approach, content analysis, and quantitative linguistic methods (Type–Token Ratio, syntactic complexity analysis by T-unit), as well as semantic modeling, fact verification, and semantic-stylistic analysis. It has been proven that Ukrainian-language AI texts formally meet the basic criteria of textuality (cohesion, coherence, articulation), which are implemented through the probabilistic combination of templates rather than the author’s cognitive and communicative activity. Typical markers of machine generation have been identified: template composition (introduction – main part (3–5 subtopics) – conclusion), homogeneous paragraphs of “average” length, predominance of direct word order, presence of passive constructions, excessive frequency of formal connectors, structural and lexical monotony, errors in word usage. Semantic analysis revealed a combination of formal correctness with factual “hallucinations,” low information density, a predominance of neutral style, superficial, statistically determined expressiveness, and emotional masking. It was concluded that texts generated by artificial intelligence constitute a separate linguistic phenomenon with its own set of characteristics, which requires a special typology and a flexible, updatable analysis methodology. The risks to linguistic norms, speech culture, and information security are emphasized, as well as the need to develop critical competence in users regarding the perception of AI content.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access 2026

Characterization and Mechanisms of Lexical Complexity in AI-Generated Texts: A Comparative Corpus-Based Study

Analysis of AIGC texts points out that the complexity of AI text primarily stems from its mechanism of selecting vocabulary based on probability distributions, which favors longer words, abstract nouns, and words with high semantic content, thereby forming a highly compact linguistic surface.

Lulu Chen · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Syntactic Complexity in AI-Generated vs. Human-Authored Linguistic and Literary Texts

The results indicate that the complexity of syntax is genre-based and not source-based and in general, the discipline genre had a more significant effect on syntax variation than the authorship source.

Asia A. Alheety, Meethaq Khamees Khalaf, H. Mohammed · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

LINGUISTIC FEATURES OF AI-GENERATED TEXTS AND METHODS FOR THEIR AUTOMATED IDENTIFICATION

It is argued that automated detection should not replace expert linguistic analysis but should serve as an auxiliary tool for evaluating the probable origin of a text in media linguistics, fact-checking, and educational practic.

N. Babkova, D. Huliieva, Z. Kochuieva et al. · 0 citations
Open access 2022

Semantic analysis of texts in a non-linguistic university based on Bloom’s taxonomy

Methods of semantic analysis and the appeal to the semantic side of the language based on Bloom’s taxonomy in the Russian language classes at a non-linguistic university in the study and analysis of the text are actual. The role of Bloom’s taxonomy in the step-by-step implementation of the content analysis algorithm an...

R.D. Darkembayeva, N. Ozekbayeva, F. Sametova · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Human vs AI-Generated Texts in Language Learning: A Linguistic Comparison

The findings show that AI-generated texts exhibit greater lexical diversity and syntactic complexity; however, they often exhibit structural uniformity, overuse of cohesive devices, and limited pragmatic depth, and should not replace professionally designed educational materials.

V. Smaglii, T. Korolova, Svitlana Yukhymets et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.