2026· Bakhtiniana: Revista de Estudos do Discurso· 0 citations· 5 references
TL;DR
It is predicted that for these topics to be explored accurately, it is necessary to decentralize the human and adopt a hybrid view of humans, society, and language.
Abstract
ABSTRACT This study is a qualitative bibliographic essay that aims to question and seek to understand the (non)existence of otherness and the (non)production of meaning in the processes of interaction between humans and machines. To this end, we conducted a synthesis that integrated the following topics: the dialogic conception of language, artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML) and natural language processing (NLP). During our analysis, we raised questions that led us to an unstable ground, and we concluded that we cannot completely exclude the idea of meaning production by machines, given that we also cannot affirm the existence of otherness. Therefore, we foresee that for these topics to be explored accurately, it is necessary to decentralize the human and adopt a hybrid view of humans, society, and language.
The paper attempts to provide new, original answers to the question of what would make AI ‘genuine’ or ‘human-like’, and analyse which features of the human mind are necessary to conclude that their owner is “genuinely intelligent”.
The ethical limits of AI, particularly generative AI, such as ChatGPT, are discussed, questioning its impact on human processes of interaction and meaning-making, and the extent to which AI can engage in authentic dialogue is assessed.
João Batista Costa Gonçalves, Marcos Roberto dos Santos Amaral, M. A. Barros· Bakhtiniana: Revista de Estu...· 0 citations
The article deals with implications of the rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLM) for the understanding of the creative process using artificial intelligence (AI) and also discusses the new realities in the creative and educational spheres associated with it. The authors propose distinguishing creativity as a...
A. Vnutskikh, Andrey G. Kuznetsov, N. Okonskaya et al.· Вестник Пермского университе...· 0 citations
This paper concludes that machines may assist translators but that they will not, by principle, be able to reach an almost perfect level and object to the huge amount of money spent on software development for systems with that objective.
This volume contains articles which provide different aspects of the discussion on what such bots and AI are, from the two perspectives, which are probably the most general: the philosophical and the theological one; an important step towards the project of philosophical and theological botology.
Marcin Trepczyński· Scientia et Fides· 0 citations
It is argued that AI systems themselves will increasingly participate in the reconstruction of the authors' shared epistemic environment because they readily supply narrative material and personalised interpretive scaffolding at precisely the moment when users'conceptual assumptions may already be loosened.
T. Pollak, H. Morrin, Murray Shanahan· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.
