Skip to content
Open access

Stone Clearance Rates Following Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy: Comparative Efficacy in Lower Pole and Other Renal Locations: A Prospective Observational Study.

Sep 2026 · INNOVAPATH · Vol 1, pp. 12 · 0 citations · 38 references

TL;DR

ESWL achieved high short-term stone clearance rates across different intrarenal stone locations, with comparable outcomes observed between lower pole and non-lower pole calculi in this cohort.

Abstract

Introduction: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) remains a widely used non-invasive treatment for renal calculi, yet stone clearance in lower pole stones has been debated due to anatomical and gravitational factors. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted at the Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation (SIUT), Karachi, between June and December 2022. A total of 105 patients with solitary renal stones measuring 4–20 mm was included. Patients were categorized by stone location: lower pole (Group 1), mid pole (Group 2), pelvis (Group 3), and upper pole (Group 4). All underwent ESWL on a Storz Modulith SLX lithotripter under a standardized protocol, with a maximum of three sessions. Stone-free status was assessed radiologically three weeks after treatment. Statistical analyses included chi-square and t-tests, with significance at p < 0.05. Results: The mean age of participants was 41.45 ± 12.32 years; 55.2% were male. The mean stone size was 12.3 ± 3.3 mm. The overall stone-free rate was 86.7%. Clearance was achieved in 85.7% of lower pole stones (Group 1), 84.6% in mid pole (Group 2), 87.2% in pelvis (Group 3), and 90.9% in upper pole (Group 4), with no statistically significant differences among groups (p = 0.967). Complications were minimal and self‑limited. Conclusion: ESWL achieved high short-term stone clearance rates across different intrarenal stone locations, with comparable outcomes observed between lower pole and non-lower pole calculi in this cohort. Larger multicenter studies incorporating anatomical and radiological predictors with longer follow-up are needed to validate these findings and optimize patient selection.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Sep 2026

Outcome of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) for High Density Renal Stones

Objective: To compare the effects of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in comparison with high-density renal stones (1000 Hounsfield units) with respect to stone-free rate, auxiliary procedures, and complications. Methods: A total of one hundred and two consecutive adult patients having renal stones at most...

Rizwan Ullah, Asad Shamsher, Muhammad Yasir Mujtaba, Hassamullah Khan, Isar Ahmad, Muhammad Afnan · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Outcomes and predictors of success after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal stones: a retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is a first-line treatment for renal stones, yet outcomes are variable. This study aimed to identify predictors of stone clearance, complications, and number of treatment sessions in patients undergoing ESWL for kidney stones. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a r...

Mazen Karama, F. Noman, A. Karama et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Comparison of outcomes of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery in the management of renal calculi measuring one to two centimeters

ABSTRACT Objectives: To compare outcomes of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for renal stones measuring 1-2 cm, including stone clearance, hospital stay, hematuria, sepsis, postoperative pain, and retreatment. Methodology: Six months, single-center, open-label, paral...

Muhammad Waqas Arshad, A. Javed, Shafeullah Ahadi et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Compared with Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for 10-20 mm Renal Stones in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Mini-PCNL may provide superior stone clearance and fewer retreatments than ESWL for pediatric renal stones <2 cm, but current evidence remains limited by study quality and heterogeneity.

R. A. Lantemona, Ananda Firdaus, Ferdian Harum Istikanto et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Clinical impact of stone multiplicity on outcomes of retrograde intra-renal surgery.

RIRS demonstrates comparable efficacy and safety for single and multiple renal stones, supporting its use on a viable treatment option in patients with stone multiplicity, and larger adequately powered studies are warranted to determine whether smaller between-group differences exist.

Ahmed M. Abdel Gawad, T. Abouelgreed, M. Rehan et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.