Aug 2026· Journal of imaging informatics in medicine· 0 citations· 229 references
Medicine
TL;DR
A structured foundation and classification approach is provided to meaningfully evaluate and advance interpretable AI model approaches in echocardiography and highlights the distinct challenges and promising research directions for each approach.
Abstract
Echocardiography is a central modality for cardiac diagnosis; rising clinical demand and advances in machine learning have accelerated AI development for automated analysis. As these systems may influence high-stakes decisions, model interpretability is essential for clinical trust and accountability. In this review, we define interpretable AI model approaches as strategies that improve interpretability through intrinsically interpretable components within transparent models or post hoc explainable AI (XAI) for black-box models. We synthesized 170 echocardiography studies using interpretable AI model approaches and mapped model types, explanation strategies, and evaluation practices. To compare approach-specific patterns, studies were categorized into multistep and end-to-end frameworks, representing intermediate representation versus direct prediction. Multistep studies were more prevalent and typically combined convolutional neural network (CNN)-based upstream models with intrinsically interpretable downstream approaches. End-to-end studies included more complex architectures, with the most common pairing being CNN-based models with class activation mapping-based visualizations. Evaluation practices also differed by framework. Multistep studies more frequently reported quantitatively defined clinical metrics and included several studies demonstrating prospective, application-level implementation. In contrast, at the model-approach instance level, end-to-end instances relied more often on qualitative-grounded evaluation than multistep upstream instances (23/57, 40.4% vs. 2/122, 1.6%). Collectively, these findings highlight the distinct challenges and promising research directions for each approach: multistep models may benefit from more advanced architectures, whereas end-to-end models require more deliberate post hoc explanation methods and stronger quantitative evaluation to support clinical translation. This work, therefore, provides a structured foundation and classification approach to meaningfully evaluate and advance interpretable AI model approaches in echocardiography.
It is concluded that explainable artificial intelligence improves trust, reliability, and accountability in healthcare systems and is a prerequisite for successful integration of intelligent technologies into clinical practice.
Riya Jacob K· International Journal of Tec...· 0 citations
The increasing adoption of AI in cancer diagnosis requires transparency and interpretability, particularly in AI-based clinical decision support systems. However, the inherent complexity and opacity of many AI models hinder their clinical acceptance and integration into healthcare workflows. This systematic review prov...
Muhammad Hassan, Muhammad Zubair, Rozeena Ibrahim et al.· IEEE Access· 0 citations
Recent advancements in foundation models (FMs) have catalyzed a paradigm shift in medical image analysis. Unlike traditional task-specific artificial intelligence (AI) models, FMs leverage large-scale datasets to learn generalized representations that can be adapted to downstream clinical applications. Despite the rapi...
P. Rajendran, M. Safari, Wen-Feng He et al.· Medical Image Analysis· 0 citations
A multiview video-language framework improved report retrieval compared with conventional image-based approaches and support the utility of video-based, multiview representation learning for echocardiographic report retrieval.
R. Takizawa, Chiemi Yamazaki, S. Kodera et al.· JACC: Asia· 0 citations
AI-assisted diagnostic tools typically act as a "second opinion," providing radiologists with a discrete prediction or probability score that can be consulted alongside clinical context. This treats AI as an independent advisor rather than a collaborative partner, leaving its reasoning largely opaque. We explore a comp...
E. Dack, C. Dai, H. Hoppe et al.· medRxiv· 0 citations
Most artificial intelligence (AI) models used in radiology are black boxes-they produce predictions without explaining the basis of their outputs, raising concerns about clinical safety, accountability, and trust. To address this, a growing body of methods has been developed to help clinicians understand and evaluate A...
Gorkem Durak, H. Aktas, Tugba Akinci D'Antonoli et al.· Diagnostic and Interventiona...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.