This work provides a comprehensive reference and guideline for classification, prevention and fix of M-agent bugs, and developed a comprehensive taxonomy that classifies bugs by global symptoms, functionality component-level symptoms, and root causes.
Abstract
Multi-Modal Agents (M-agents), empowered by Large Language Models (LLMs), excel in various complex, open-world scenarios such as autonomous driving and robotics. However, their unique requirements to interact with dynamic and diverse multi-modal environments introduce novel implementation challenges beyond those faced by traditional agents. Outdated perception, untrustworthy planning and inapplicable execution could cause traffic accident and financial loss. Despite growing study on agent issues, there has not been a systematic study focusing on M-agent-specific implementation bugs. To address this gap, we conducted the first systematic study of implementation bugs in M-agents. We collected 34 representative M-agents from diverse sources and, through meticulous filtering,identified 158 M-agent-specific bugs from 1,268 issue reports. Using a top-down strategy, we developed a comprehensive taxonomy that classifies bugs by global symptoms, functionality component-level symptoms, and root causes. We then implemented MATester, an automatic proof-of-concept bug identifier by analyzing runtime inter-component outputs. When applied to 12 extra M-agents, MATester successfully covered 61.4% of known open issues and discovered 31 additional bugs, demonstrating the practical usefulness of our study. Our work provides a comprehensive reference and guideline for classification, prevention and fix of M-agent bugs.
A unified, taxonomy-driven, and deployment-oriented survey of agentic AI systems, synthesizing recent advances through a modular reference architecture and a four-dimensional taxonomy that characterizes agents along the axes of autonomy, tool use, collaboration, and safety–governance is presented.
Sparsh Bajoria, Shreyanshu Ranjan, Adhitya M et al.· Cognitive Computation· 0 citations
To test whether the taxonomy supports mitigation, TART, Taxonomy-Guided Actionable Representation, is introduced that makes the taxonomy's key aspects explicit to the planner and downstream sub-agents and consistently improves performance.
Vikas Pahuja, J. Brokman, O. Hofman et al.· 0 citations
This work formulate two communication attacks corresponding to distinct attacker access settings: the External Entry Point Attack and the Privileged In-System Attack that evaluate both attacks across DMAS, HMAS-1, and HMAS-2.
Zhen Huang, Zhi-Huang Liu, Wei Shi et al.· 1 citation
This work introduces Model Automated Deployment Engine (MADE), a dual-agent coordination system that iteratively constructs and validates the deployment artifacts, updates its deployment belief based on execution feedback, and revisits invalid upstream artifacts until the model is successfully served as a ready-to-call...
Yicheng Liu, Bolin Zhang, Weiran Liu et al.· 0 citations
Multi-agent large language models (LLMs) have become ubiquitous in applied AI, yet their theoretical foundations remain surprisingly understudied. Viewed through the lens of multi-agent systems theory, several shortcomings come to light: a lack of social intelligence, the absence of coordination mechanisms among agents...
Mehdi Nasiri, Mohammad Saeed Arvenaghi, Sadegh Vaezi et al.· 0 citations
This work introduces a controlled and MAS-demanding diagnostic benchmark for representative MAS efficiency methods and shows that many reported gains are setup-dependent and may arise from structural collapse, disabled tool pathways, or starting systems where random pruning already preserves accuracy, rather than robus...
Jiamu Zhang, Ling-Xi Zhang, Peng-Jun Lu et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.