Skip to content
Open access

Between Seriousness and Play: Imperial Platonic Readings of the Aristotelian Natural Problems (Plutarch, Taurus, Apuleius)

2017 · Research Portal (King's College London) · Vol 5 · 0 citations · 15 references

Abstract

The aim of this contribution is to examine how the Natural Problems, attributed to Aristotle (but only partially authentic), were received in the first centuries of the Imperial period, specifically in Platonist milieus. I will zoom in on three distinguished Platonic readers: viz. Plutarch of Chaeronea, L. Calvenus Taurus, and Apuleius of Madauros. Which reading contexts can we distinguish in the literature and what do we learn about the readers’ response to what was read? Answering questions like these will contribute to our better understanding of how the Aristotelian genre of natural problems was revived and gained in popularity beyond the confines of the Lyceum, in an era that was pivotal to the transmission of Aristotelianism to many generations to come.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Oct 2026

Readers of the Living: Interpretive Mastery and Natural Thinking in Plutarch, Celsus, Origen, and Porphyry

This article examines the intersection between imperial writings on animals and post-Hellenistic debates about exegesis. It is the first study to argue that interpreters drawing on Aristotelian theories of voice and Hellenistic ideas of natural sympathy treated the meaningful but non-verbal animal as a test case of n...

Lea Niccolai · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Negotiating Aristotelian-Avicennan Natural Philosophy in the Early Ottoman Madrasa

As the most widely circulated early Ottoman gloss on Aristotelian-Avicennan natural philosophy, Ḫocazāde’s paratext on Mullāzāde’s commentary on Abharī’s Hidāyat al-ḥikma illuminates the reception and defense of hylomorphism in postclassical madrasas. Working largely within an Avicennan framework, this previously...

E. M. Balıkçıoğlu · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Comparisons Ancient and Modern: Was Cyril of Alexandria a Good Reader of Paul?

Cyril of Alexandria is the final stop on Michael Magree's analysis of the patristic interpretation of Pauline kenosis, serving as the culmination of the historical arc he surveys. Although Magree is careful to avoid overtly judging the success of various interpreters as readers of the Apostle, it is clear that he fin...

M. Crawford · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

‘And yet we that live remissly, undertake as great dangers as they’: Thucydides 2.39–40 and the reappropriation of anti-Athenian slurs

This paper argues that Thuc. 2.39–40 offers an ironic response to contemporary criticism of Athens by positively reframing the key terms associated with anti-Athenian slurs. It traces the use of aneimenōs , rhaithumia and related concepts in Thucydides and other Classical sources, showing how these terms were a...

Jakub Filonik · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

Gift und Gegengift

Abstract Lorenzo Valla is renowned for his attempt to revitalise the classical language of ancient Rome, the ‚golden Latin‘ of Cicero’s epoch and the ‚silver Latin‘ from the time of Seneca and Tacitus. And indeed, he succeeded in restoring an antiquated style of prose writing and pompous speech, which might be satirise...

N. Staubach · 0 citations
Open access 2026

Concepts of Bareness (Nuditas) in Medieval Philosophy

The Aristotelian idiom, according to which the intellect is a “blank” or “bare slate” before it has experienced the sensory world was also used in empiricist arguments during the Middle Ages. In this short inquiry, I examine the use of the adjective bare (or naked) in both epistemology and metaphysics, focusing on four...

E. Lukacs · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.