Jul 2026· Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences· Vol 289, pp. 1-8· 0 citations
TL;DR
This paper analyzes the internal law of the multi-agent cross-questioning mechanism, and summarizes a set of structured analysis frameworks, to believe that the dynamic inquiry paradigm is conducive to optimizing and reshaping the existing asset valuation benchmark in a complex trading environment.
Abstract
This paper systematically reviews the evolution direction of financial artificial intelligence (AI) from traditional statistical fitting to dynamic confrontation. With the help of functional isolation, evidence-based game theory and parameter correction, this paper analyzes the internal law of the multi-agent cross-questioning mechanism, and summarizes a set of structured analysis frameworks. Relevant studies have shown that compared with a single model, the core purpose of building a specific questioning mechanism using confrontation topology is to get through the logic of transforming unstructured semantic risk into structured valuation parameters, to clearly depict the cross-modal mapping path between the two. This model has significant theoretical feasibility in improving the internal consistency of pricing logic and restraining unreasonable premiums. This paper believes that the dynamic inquiry paradigm is conducive to optimizing and reshaping the existing asset valuation benchmark in a complex trading environment. To truly land the man-machine collaborative pricing system, the core is to focus on how to resolve the technical barriers of reasoning interpretability, privacy protection, collaborative deduction and penetration algorithm audit. Only by achieving substantial breakthroughs in these bottlenecks can the follow-up system construction have a solid foundation.
Artificial intelligence has transformed dynamic pricing by enabling firms to forecast demand more accurately, respond to market uncertainty, and optimize prices in real time. Existing reviews remain fragmented, typically focusing on a single industry or on isolated methodological streams like reinforcement learning or...
Dervis Ozay, M. Jahanbakht, Shouyi Wang· Journal of Theoretical and A...· 0 citations
The proposed Multi-Agent Regime Intelligence Framework is an interpretable, extensible architecture unifying signal domains that are normally treated separately in Indian derivatives literature, rather than a claim of validated trading performance.
Deepanshu Lamba, Neelam Srivastav· Journal of Frontiers in Mult...· 0 citations
Aims: This study develops a dynamic explanation for the gap between task-level artificial intelligence productivity and durable enterprise value. It introduces verification debt, the accumulated stock of unverified assumptions, weak review, concealed dependencies, deferred validation, and capability loss.
Study Design:...
Kwan-Hong Tan· Journal of global economics,...· 2 citations
The investment boom surrounding generative artificial intelligence has revived comparisons with the dot-com bubble. This article argues that the analogy is useful only when technological diffusion, financial valuation, market structure, and physical infrastructure are analyzed separately. A technology may create substa...
Sérgio Matos da Silva· Nexus Science Review· 0 citations
This paper advances five theoretical propositions that indicate conditions under which GenAI involvement has the potential to improve or impair the quality of strategic decisions and provides an empirical research agenda to test these propositions.
Nagaraj , Jennifer Ethirajulu , Lai· Journal of Business Practice...· 0 citations
This work evaluates SEADS against five re-implemented baselines on two US equity panels using this standard: no single metric ranks the systems consistently, motivating evaluation on multiple axes at once.
Ying-Jian Pan, Xiao-Wei Ding, Kay Giesecke· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.