Overall, celecoxib and ibuprofen demonstrated broadly comparable analgesic efficacy following third-molar surgery, and current evidence does not establish consistent overall superiority over ibuprofen.
Abstract
Third-molar surgery is commonly associated with acute postoperative pain, for which nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely used. Celecoxib, a selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor, may provide effective analgesia while potentially offering improved tolerability compared with conventional nonselective NSAIDs. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials that compared celecoxib with ibuprofen following surgical extraction of the impacted mandibular third molars. Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science (WoS), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from inception to August 2026. Ten RCTs involving 1,090 patients were included, with 671 patients receiving celecoxib and 419 receiving ibuprofen. Postoperative pain was evaluated at 4-8, 12-16, and 24 hours using the visual analog scale (VAS), total pain relief (TOPAR/TOTPAR), and sum of pain relief and pain intensity difference (SPRID/SPID). No significant differences were observed between celecoxib and ibuprofen at 4-8 or 12-16 hours across any of the pain assessment scales. At 24 hours, celecoxib was associated with significantly lower VAS pain scores (standardized mean difference [SMD], −0.35; 95% CI, −0.61 to −0.08; p = 0.01), whereas no significant difference was observed using TOPAR/TOTPAR (SMD, 0.36; 95% CI, −0.00 to 0.73; p = 0.05). Rescue analgesic use did not differ significantly between groups (RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.80-1.25; p = 1.00) and neither did adverse events (RR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.65-1.32; p = 0.67). Trial sequential analysis did not provide conclusive evidence of a beneficial effect. Overall, celecoxib and ibuprofen demonstrated broadly comparable analgesic efficacy following third-molar surgery. Although celecoxib may provide a modest reduction in pain intensity at 24 hours, current evidence does not establish consistent overall superiority over ibuprofen.
Third molar extraction is one of the most common procedures in oral surgery and is frequently associated with postoperative pain, edema, and trismus. In this context, this systematic review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of premedication with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on postoperative outcomes...
Valentina Delich-Pardo, Matías González-Zeballos, V. Casado et al.· Journal of dental anesthesia...· 0 citations
NSAIDs improved analgesia and reduced opioid use after TORS without significantly increasing POH risk, supporting NSAID integration into postoperative protocols.
Rahul D. Patel, Connor J. Dorais, Tristen Hofmann et al.· Head and Neck· 1 citation
INTRODUCTION
Post-tonsillectomy pain represents the major morbidity of the procedure, contributing to poor oral intake, dehydration, and hemorrhage. Ibuprofen, a non-selective cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitor, is commonly used for post-operative analgesia but demonstrates potent platelet inhibition. Celecoxib, a selectiv...
Lexy Maulsby, Mitchell Phillips, Adele K. Evans· International Journal of Ped...· 0 citations
Subcutaneous diclofenac and ketorolac may reduce short-term acute pain compared with placebo, however, the evidence is limited and safety remains uncertain.
Moe Omiya, T. Takada, Honami Yoshida et al.· Journal of Pain & Palliative...· 0 citations
Opioids remain the backbone for postoperative analgesia, but adverse effects and misuse remain major concerns. Suzetrigine (VX-548), a selective NaV1.8 inhibitor, is an FDA-approved non-opioid analgesic for moderate-to-severe acute pain. This PRISMA-guided systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and...
Preet S. Patel, Benjamin Klayman, Raiya Patel et al.· Journal of Anesthesiology an...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.