Skip to content

Regulating for an AI Commons: Adopting, sustaining, and defending people-first innovation trajectories

Oct 2026 · 0 citations · 2 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

A three-pillared holistic and intentional policy approach that actively pushes for the adoption of cooperative technologies in existing and emerging systems, sets up collective institutional structures to sustain and maintain them in the long-term, and introduces regulatory proposals that limit private entities from disempowering them through uncontrolled enclosure and extraction is outlined.

Abstract

Technological principles of openness, interoperability, and decentralization are integral to building an AI economy that is accountable to the public and truly responsive to local needs and constraints. However, Big Tech's firm control over essential elements of the stack (such as chips, cloud, models, data, and talent) limits valuable alternatives from reaching the scale necessary for sustained growth. Worse still, hyperscalers continue to enclose and extract value from publicly funded and volunteer-driven technologies without adequately distributing these returns. We see consolidated power within a few entities and"enshittification"of once-transformative innovations. Embedding ethical micro-level tools (like open data repositories or small-language models) into workflows is promising, but without a consistent innovation strategy, they also often end up perpetuating and being appropriated by the same exploitative trajectories. Instead, this whitepaper outlines a three-pillared holistic and intentional policy approach that i) actively pushes for the adoption of cooperative technologies in existing and emerging systems, ii) sets up collective institutional structures to sustain and maintain them in the long-term, and iii) introduces regulatory proposals that limit private entities from disempowering them through uncontrolled enclosure and extraction. Through desk research and purpose-specific case studies, we argue for the importance of such an approach in the Global South, where structural constraints around infrastructure, financing, and policy governance make it difficult for AI commons and cooperative AI tools to emerge and survive. The paper concludes with key open questions for campaigners, policy advocates, researchers, and grassroots organizers to consider and explore while working towards peoples'solidarity within and between Global South countries.

View source

Similar papers

Open access Sep 2026

Expanding “Green AI” Beyond Model Efficiency

This commentary argues that the artificial intelligence (AI) boom is not immaterial but relies on energy- and resource-intensive infrastructures. While “Green AI” scholarship has advanced model-level efficiency metrics and reporting, it has largely overlooked the material circuits that enable these models. We explain h...

Si-Bo Chen, De-Qiang Ji · 1 citation
Review Open access Sep 2026

Shadow AI in the Enterprise: A Governance Framework for Transitioning from Uncontrolled Experimentation to Secure, Accountable AI Adoption

The paper presents a ten-principle governance model, a risk-tiering structure, an agent-identity control baseline, and a four-phase implementation roadmap, concluding that prohibition-based strategies are largely ineffective and that visibility, safe enablement, and embedded controls produce more durable risk reduction...

Abhipray Mirke, Sushmita Dey Banik · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Regulating the “Unregulatable”: Why Policymakers Are in Paralysis When Regulating AI

Policymakers confronting generative AI have often accepted a striking premise: that AI is too complex, too fast-moving, and too “unprecedented” to be governed by existing frameworks. We argue that this premise is itself part of the problem. Many harms associated with generative AI, including fraud, impersonation, decep...

Sarah Barrington, Hannah Bailey · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

The Global AI Divide: Infrastructure, Access and Policy Pathways for Democratising Artificial Intelligence

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is becoming more accessible via cloud platforms and generative AI tools. However, the skills needed to develop, manage, and regulate advanced AI are still concentrated in a few countries and major tech companies. This study introduces the emerging Global AI Divide, defined as a capability g...

Rakesh Kumar, Shilpi Shrivastawa · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

From the platform society to the AI society

Generative AI is becoming embedded in infrastructures of knowledge, culture, and political authority, giving rise to an emerging AI society . This transformation did not arise ex nihilo : it is rooted in the platform society whose infrastructures, data, and political economies it reorganizes. The article traces t...

Petter Törnberg, J. Uitermark · 2 citations

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.