Skip to content

Consensus as Privileged Context for Label-Free Self-Distillation

Jul 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2607.13643 · 2 citations · 32 references
Computer Science

Abstract

Sampling multiple solutions and returning the majority answer is among the most reliable ways to improve the reasoning accuracy of large language models without labels, and a growing family of methods converts this consensus signal into training supervision. However, existing approaches use consensus only in restricted forms: as a filter that selects solutions for fine-tuning, as a preference between answers, or as a scalar reward for reinforcement learning, discarding most of the information that the agreeing solutions contain. We present CANON (Consensus-ANchored self-distillatiON), a label-free training method that turns consensus into dense, token-level supervision. For each unlabeled prompt, CANON samples multiple solutions, extracts the majority answer, and conditions a frozen snapshot of the model on a solution that reaches it; this consensus-anchored teacher then supervises the model on its own rollouts at every token. Experiments on mathematical and scientific reasoning benchmarks show that CANON improves pass@1 by up to 12 points, outperforming label-free reinforcement learning by 6 points at a seventh of its compute and approaching a teacher conditioned on gold solutions; trained on pooled unlabeled data, it transfers to held-out benchmarks, matching training methods that use gold labels. Analysis suggests that the improvements are not pure distribution sharpening: after training, the model solves problems it previously never solved in 32 attempts, and its majority vote itself becomes more accurate.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Aug 2026

On-Policy Self-Distillation without Any Supervision

U-OPSD first samples multiple rollouts and constructs a pseudo solution by majority vote under a self-consistency threshold, and conditions the model's distribution on the pseudo-solution and distills itself on the disagreeing completions, allowing the model to correct itself precisely where it is confidently wrong.

Yijiang Li, Bingyang Wang, Yijun Liang et al. · 2 citations
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Learn from Whoever Is Right: Answer-Verified Multi-Teacher Distillation for Multi-Domain LLMs

Modern large language models (LLMs) rely on reinforcement learning to build strong capabilities in individual domains, but integrating those capabilities into a single deployable model remains challenging. By routing each sample to the teacher whose domain matches it, existing approaches let a domain label decide which teacher provides supervision. However, domain expertise holds only on average: the matched teacher is not always correct on a given sample, while a teacher from another domain sometimes is. The reliable teacher therefore has to be identified per sample, not per domain. In this paper, we introduce Multi-Teacher Self-Distillation Policy Optimization (MT-SDPO), an on-policy distillation method that unifies several frozen teachers into one student model. MT-SDPO consists of three components: (1) self-anchors, where a rollout is supervised by a correct rollout from its own group; (2) answer-verified eligibility, where a teacher may supervise a sample only if its own answer passes a verifier; and (3) privileged distillation, which merges the anchor and all verified feedback into one context that an exponential moving average self-teacher reads and the student does not, thereby keeping one policy at deployment. Across five students from three model families, MT-SDPO lifts the weakest domain of Qwen3-8B by 14.79 points and narrows its domain gap by 74.7%, a better balance than serving one matched teacher per domain. Verified reliability, not domain membership, should decide who teaches. Code is available at https://github.com/hexixiang/MT-SDPO.

Xixiang He, Xing-Ming Li, Baiqi Wu et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Learning from Consensus and Disagreement: Unsupervised On-Policy Self-Distillation with Minority-Trajectory Contrast

CoDA is introduced, a fully unsupervised framework that creates reliable privileged information entirely from the latent uncertainty structure of a model's own unlabeled rollouts and provides robust regularization without requiring the strong assumption that the consensus is the absolute ground truth.

Jiaxin Guo, Yanwei Yue, Xuanbo Fan et al. · 0 citations
Jul 2026

Beyond the Best Teacher: Expanding and Compressing the Reasoning Solution Manifold

Strong students can be obtained not by selecting a single better teacher, but by deliberately constructing and compressing a complementary teacher union, in an expand-then-compress framework that couples teacher construction with multi-teacher policy distillation.

Songshuo Lu, Zhi Chen, Yao-Hua Tang · 1 citation
Jul 2026

Learning from the Future: Privileged Self-Distillation for Sequential Recommendation

Privileged Self-Distillation (PSD) is proposed, a framework that separates learning-time information from inference-time information and uses an advantage-reachability gate to focus distillation on teacher signals likely supported by the observed prefix, along with a momentum-averaged teacher for stable targets.

Jiakai Tang, Yang Zhang, See-Kiong Ng et al. · 1 citation
#artificial intelligence Preprint Sep 2026

Beyond Verified Answers: Solver-Informed Self-Distillation for Bootstrapping Operations Research Language Models

Modern large language models (LLMs) can translate natural-language descriptions into operations research (OR) formulations. Post-training techniques including reinforcement learning and on-policy self-distillation have further improved this capability. However, three limitations remain in training LLMs for OR formulations. First, training commonly relies on synthetic formulations validated by human experts or stronger models, constraining scalable supervision. Second, credit assignment is either coarse or costly: outcome rewards score an entire trajectory without locating the responsible modeling decision, whereas process-level supervision requires an additional evaluator. Third, privileged self-distillation can induce style mismatch by using solver context unavailable at deployment. We find that a model can improve from solver-artifact feedback generated by its own rollouts, making self-distillation a practical, evaluator-free source of dense supervision. Therefore, we propose SOLID: Solver-Informed On-Policy LearnIng through Self-Distillation, a novel framework for self-improving OR language models without verified answers or external evaluators. SOLID executes candidate programs from multiple rollouts, clusters their objectives, and selects a majority-group artifact as a pseudo-reference. The model then performs updates using group-relative advantages and dense self-supervision signals. Across multiple OR benchmarks, SOLID improves solution accuracy for both general-purpose and OR-tuned models over outcome-only group-relative training. These results show that solver artifacts can support scalable self-improvement without trusted answers.

Rui-Chen Zhu, Ming-Long Cao, Chen-Yu Zhou et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.