Oct 2026· BİLTÜRK Journal of Economics and Related Studies· Vol 8, pp. 410-423· 0 citations· 7 references
TL;DR
It is suggested that allowing volatility to change at empirically identified points can provide a more useful stochastic representation of Bitcoin volatility than a single-regime GBM.
Abstract
Cryptocurrency prices often experience substantial changes in volatility over time, which may limit the usefulness of stochastic models based on a constant-volatility assumption. This study examines whether accounting for structural changes can improve the stochastic modeling of Bitcoin volatility. Daily Bitcoin prices from January 2020 to December 2025 are used to calculate log returns. A standard one-regime Geometric Brownian Motion (GBM) is first estimated as a benchmark, followed by a likelihood-based change-point analysis and a regime-dependent GBM. Model selection using the Bayesian Information Criterion favors the three-regime specification over the one- and two-regime alternatives. The estimated daily return volatility decreases across the training regimes, from 0.0446 to 0.0353 and then to 0.0248. The model is further evaluated using 2025 as an out-of-sample period. The change-point-aware GBM produces substantially lower forecasting errors than the standard GBM, with RMSE decreasing by 51.6% and MAE by 54.7%. These results suggest that allowing volatility to change at empirically identified points can provide a more useful stochastic representation of Bitcoin volatility than a single-regime GBM.
This study investigates the volatility dynamics of Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), and Binance Coin (BNB) from 1 January 2021 to 31 December 2025. Using daily return data, the study applies Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity (GARCH)(1,2), Exponential GARCH (EGARCH)(1,2), and Power ARCH (PARCH)(1,2...
Thomas Sumarsan Goh, Erika Erika, Albert Albert et al.· Journal of Risk and Financia...· 0 citations
The principal finding is that the relative ranking of cryptocurrency volatility forecasts is highly sensitive to the choice of loss function but stable across alternative volatility proxies, indicating that the apparent superiority of LSTM models in cryptocurrency volatility forecasting is partly an artefact of evaluat...
Keith Reuben Muyungi, Jun-Juan Hu· International Journal of Inn...· 0 citations
A partially observed Markov processes (POMP) model augmented with sentiment and heavy-tailed distributions is developed, extending Breto's framework by including the Fear and Greed Index as an exogenous regressor in the latent volatility dynamics and replacing Gaussian measurement noise with a Student's t distribution.
Abeyankar Giridharan, Chang Li, Suvrorup Mukherjee et al.· 0 citations
The study of regime-dependent predictability of cryptocurrency market distress is examined in this paper using the dynamics of cross-exchange spread signals as an innovative early-warning tool. The research offers a three-stage econometric framework comprising: a Markov regime-switching VAR to infer endogenous bull, tr...
Tarek Sadraoui, Sameh Zarai· Journal of Risk and Financia...· 0 citations
Cryptocurrencies trade continuously while major traditional markets close over the weekend. We examine whether weekend cryptocurrency volatility predicts Monday variance in equity, commodity and fixed-income markets. Using daily range-based variance measures for Bitcoin, Ether, XRP, the S&P 500, gold and a US Treasury...
Pedram Ebadollahyvahed, N. Umeorah· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.