This work establishes concept support, beyond individual sample importance, as a useful principle for data-efficient and robust learning, as a useful principle for data-efficient and robust learning.
Abstract
Data selection reallocates training support across visual concepts, including objects, attributes, color, texture, and backgrounds. Different allocation strategies may produce varied downstream model behavior, especially for tail concepts supported by only a few samples. Discarding them can hurt test-time robustness, while overemphasizing samples lying on category boundaries may introduce unstable training signals. This work explicitly investigates this relationship across fine-grained, spurious-correlation, and general image classification, as well as multimodal pretraining. Specifically, we use sparse autoencoders (SAEs) to extract concept activations from individual images. During selection, we accumulate the dataset-level concept support for each added sample. Applying diminishing returns to this distribution down-weights well-represented concepts and shifts the focus to the distribution tail. We then incorporate local support to find samples that reliably strengthen under-supported concepts. Empirical results show consistent improvements over strong data selection baselines across all benchmarks. We also reveal the connection between concepts our method enhances and the induced behavioral changes, including improved robustness against out-of-distribution and spurious contexts. This work establishes concept support, beyond individual sample importance, as a useful principle for data-efficient and robust learning.
While data collection for model training is relatively easy, curating high-quality datasets from large collections is inherently challenging. Coreset estimation methods address this problem by identifying the best data subsets to train models on. However, existing approaches often require proxy model training, extensiv...
Julia Hindel, Benjamin Ramtoula, Kyuhwan Yeon et al.· 0 citations
Across ResNet12 and Conv64 in 5-way 1-shot and 5-shot evaluation, SAMPLESELECT gives the best OOD accuracy among the compared methods and improves the matched full-representation control by 4.90-8.38 percentage points.
Feng-Rui Liu, Ning-Xin Shen, Yi Li et al.· 0 citations
Real-world datasets often follow a long-tailed distribution, making generalization to tail classes difficult. We revisit this problem through the lens of shortcut learning, where models prefer the easiest predictive cues (e.g., background or textures) over object-centric semantics, especially under scarce and biased su...
Wen-Hai Wan, Teng-Fei Zhang, Shao-Yuan Li et al.· 0 citations
This work introduces SCALPEL, a contrastive sparse autoencoder designed to learn more selective forget features and shows theoretically that contrastive training promotes target-selective features and that the selection score controls expected background knowledge perturbation.
Tabular foundation models (TFMs) are increasingly popular because they deliver strong predictions on new datasets through in-context learning, without task-specific training or extensive tuning. Yet released TFMs differ simultaneously in their pretraining priors, architectures, and objectives, obscuring their respectiv...
Tian-Qi Zhao, Tian-Yi Zhuang, Shuo Duan et al.· 0 citations
It is shown how pretrained information reshapes the implicit bias and training dynamics, and can thereby reduce the sample complexity of recovering the target parameters and support, by gradient-based fine-tuning.
A.-E. Decleves, Etienne Boursier, Nicolas Flammarion· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.