Skip to content
Open access

Effectiveness of Newly Initiated Tofacitinib and Biologic DMARDs in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis.

Oct 2026 · Rheumatology and Therapy · 0 citations · 19 references
Medicine

TL;DR

There were no statistically significant differences in CDAI remission and LDA rates between treatments at 6 and 12 months and potential HTE was observed among subgroups of age ≥ 50 years, obesity, prior b/tsDMARD use, corticosteroid use, and Sjӧgren's disease.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION This new-user, active comparator study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) evaluated the real-world effectiveness of tofacitinib versus biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) using data from the US OM1 PremiOM™ RA dataset.

Methods

This analysis included patients with RA aged ≥ 18 years initiating tofacitinib or bDMARDs (tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, TNFi; abatacept; interleukin-6 inhibitors, IL-6i) from January 1, 2013-March 13, 2024, with > 1 Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) score in the 45 days prior to and including the index date. Propensity score weighting adjusted for differences in baseline characteristics between treatment groups. Crude incidence rates were calculated to estimate the first record of CDAI remission (CDAI ≤ 2.8) and low disease activity (LDA; CDAI ≤ 10.0) at 6 and 12 months. Cox regression was used to estimate weighted hazard ratios. Subgroup analyses assessed heterogeneity of treatment effects (HTE).

Results

The final sample size across cohorts was 3681 (tofacitinib), 11,667 (TNFi), 3528 (abatacept), and 2464 (IL-6i). At baseline, the proportion of patients with observed RA disease duration ≥ 2 years was 48.7-70.0% across cohorts; use of 2/3/≥ 4 prior biologic/targeted synthetic (b/ts) DMARDs was 21.4%/10.2%/5.0% (tofacitinib), versus 8.1%/3.0%/2.4% (TNFi), 19.2%/8.3%/3.7% (abatacept), and 25.4%/13.7%/10.5% (IL-6i). In the overall and TNFi-experienced population, there were no statistically significant differences in CDAI remission and LDA rates between treatments at 6 and 12 months. Potential HTE was observed among subgroups of age ≥ 50 years, obesity, prior b/tsDMARD use, corticosteroid use, and Sjӧgren's disease.

Conclusion

At 6 and 12 months, there were no significant differences in achieving or maintaining CDAI remission and LDA for tofacitinib versus TNFi, abatacept, and IL-6i among the overall and TNFi-experienced RA population in US clinical practice. Subgroup analyses suggest some potential HTE; however, interpretation is limited by the small number of outcome events. CLINICALTRIALS GOV ID NCT06418529.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Sep 2026

Real-world effectiveness and drug retention rate of risankizumab in patients with psoriatic arthritis: data from the multicentre GIRRCS cohort

ABSTRACT Introduction Risankizumab, a selective inhibitor of the IL-23 p19 subunit, has shown efficacy in randomized trials in psoriatic arthritis (PsA); however, real-world data remain limited. We evaluated the effectiveness and treatment persistence of risankizumab in the GIRRCS cohort. Methods This observational stu...

Francesco Caso, E. Celletti, I. Pantano et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Glucocorticoid discontinuation in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who initiated biologic or targeted synthetic agents: a real-world population-based analysis.

BACKGROUND This study aimed to evaluate glucocorticoids (GCs) discontinuation after the initiation of biological/targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, using data from a real-world population-based registry. METHODS We analyzed data from RA patient...

Ying-Zhao Jin, Huan Meng, S. Lam et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Tocilizumab in Refractory Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Retrospective Single-Centre Cohort Study of 44 Patients in Morocco

Background. Tocilizumab (TCZ), a monoclonal antibody directed against the interleukin-6 receptor, is used in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) after inadequate response or secondary loss of response to conventional synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Real-world data from North African cohor...

N. Ghani · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

COMPARATIVE STUDY ON PHARMACOVIGILANCE AND PHARMACOECONOMIC EVALUATION OF CONVENTIONAL AND BIOLOGICAL DMARD THERAPY IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory autoimmune disease requiring long-term treatment. Conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs remain the foundation of therapy, whereas biological DMARDs are important for patients requiring treatment escalation. Their safety monitoring and economic burden are...

U. P., Sarumathi S, Hariharan K et al. · 0 citations
Oct 2026

Ofatumumab vs Ocrelizumab in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES B-cell-depleting therapy with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies is a highly effective and increasingly used treatment strategy for multiple sclerosis (MS); however, comparative effectiveness of anti-CD20 therapies is unclear. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of ofatumumab co...

Sahla El Mahdaoui, L. Pontieri, Jeppe Romme Christensen et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Predictors at diagnosis for initiation of biologic or targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in patients with spondyloarthritis and psoriatic arthritis

There is limited data on factors predicting the initiation of biologic and targeted synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs/tsDMARDs) in Spondyloarthritis (SpA) and Psoriatic arthritis (PsA). The relative importance of objective inflammation and other patient factors in this context is unclear. A retr...

Mohaned Hameed, S. Exarchou, Ankita Sharma et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.