These dissociable dynamics reveal two concurrent neural computational regimes for syntactic processing: a forward-looking, locally maintained predictive code for pending structure and an integrative code engaged when structure is resolved.
Abstract
The human brain rapidly transforms continuous speech into structured, meaningful linguistic representations, yet how prior knowledge constrains this process remains unclear. To characterize this influence, we combined MEG recordings acquired during audiobook listening with corpus-derived transition probabilities over syntactic features defined within both phrase-structure and dependency-based grammars. Across grammatical formalisms, prior knowledge selectively sharpened the neural representation of memory-related features indexing syntactic structures that must remain open for future completion. This enhancement was strictly local: immediately preceding contexts improved neural decoding at both word onset and offset, whereas longer histories produced either a return to baseline at the word level or a deterioration in decoding performance. By contrast, integration-related features indexing the completion of syntactic operations showed no benefit from prior knowledge and were represented most strongly at word offset, consistent with their dependence on word-level structural resolution. These dissociable dynamics reveal two concurrent neural computational regimes for syntactic processing: a forward-looking, locally maintained predictive code for pending structure and an integrative code engaged when structure is resolved. More broadly, our findings impose a mechanistic constraint on neural theories of language processing and on accounts that equate prediction in human language comprehension with the comparatively unconstrained operations of large language models (LLMs).
The human brain must rapidly construct hierarchical structures to organize complex sequential behavior, yet the neural dynamics supporting this process during natural behavior remain poorly understood. Spoken language provides a powerful model system for investigating this computation, requiring rapid transformation of...
P. Morucci, Mamady Nabé, Sebastian Sauppe et al.· bioRxiv· 0 citations
During speech comprehension, the brain dynamically infers a hierarchy of increasingly abstract representations from the sensory input. An important step in the inferential hierarchy is the combination of words to form phrases and sentences. Whether this process is driven primarily by statistical patterns in the linguis...
S. Slaats, A. Hervais-Adelman· bioRxiv· 0 citations
Humans are the only species with the ability to systematically combine words to convey an unbounded number of complex meanings. This process is guided by combinatorial processes whose underlying neural mechanisms remain obscured by inherent limitations of noninvasive brain measures and a near-total focus on comprehensi...
Adam M. Morgan, O. Devinsky, Werner K. Doyle et al.· Science Advances· 0 citations
Two-stage models of grammatical encoding posit that sentence production unfolds in two sequential steps: the construction of a hierarchical syntactic structure, followed by its linearization into a sequence suitable for articulation. While widely accepted in psycho- and neurolinguistics, such models lack formal computa...
Jeremy D Yeaton, Grant M. Walker, Danielle Fahey et al.· Psychonomic Bulletin & Revie...· 0 citations
Although we increasingly understand how the brain processes phrase-level meaning, the role of semantic content remains underexplored. Recent models grounded in componential experiential features offer a principled framework for linking conceptual representation to the neurobiology of semantic composition. Here we used...
Shao-Nan Wang, Songhee Kim, J. Binder et al.· Journal of Neuroscience· 0 citations
Human language processing can be studied through both behavior and brain activity, yet it remains unclear whether these two data types reflect sensitivity to the same information. One influential view holds that both behavioral and neural responses are largely determined by processing effort, often estimated by word su...
Andrea Gregor de Varda, Yevgeni Berzak, Evelina Fedorenko et al.· bioRxiv· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.