‘broadSeq’, a benchmarking tool to contrast differential gene expression methods and identify when genomic neighbourhood matters

Abstract

Several tools are available to detect differential gene expression. The predominant approach of different statistical methods is to consider changes in gene expression independent from their genomic context. Previously, DELocal was introduced that takes into consideration gene expression dynamics in the genomic neighbourhood. Whereas DELocal was shown to identify developmentally regulated genes in developing mouse tooth, its performance in other biological conditions remains undetermined. To benchmark DElocal together with other methods, we develop another tool ‘broadSeq’. It provides easy to use interface for methods like DELocal, deseq2, limma, edger, EBSeq and many more. Here we report benchmarking results on different data sets that comprise wild type developing mouse organs from different embryonic time points, and also human cancer data. The examined datasets are from the heart, kidney, liver, brain, forebrain, and hindbrain. We found that most methods produce relatively comparable lists of differentially expressed genes. Nevertheless, DELocal identifies partially distinct sets of genes compared to the other methods. Evaluating the identified genes using gene and disease ontology terms show that the uniquely detected genes by DELocal are biologically relevant and also highly expressed compared to the genes identified by the other methods. Because consistently highly expressed genes show relatively subtle fold changes, the neighbourhood concept of DELocal appears to correct for the difficulty in detecting these differential expression of highly expressed genes. Finally, we provide the tools as combined bioconductor packages, allowing researchers to explore and decide the best methods for their data and questions.