Skip to content

Mini-crush versus provisional stenting in coronary bifurcation lesions: long-term results from a real-world cohort.

Sep 2026 · Cardiovascular Journal of Africa · Vol 37 3, pp. 396-403 · 0 citations
Medicine

TL;DR

In a real-world cohort of patients undergoing bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention, both mini-crush and provisional stenting strategies were associated with similar long-term clinical outcomes and the stenting technique did not predict long-term prognosis.

Abstract

Background

The optimal stenting strategy for coronary bifurcation lesions remains a topic of debate, particularly regarding the long-term comparative effectiveness of mini-crush and provisional techniques.

Methods

We analysed consecutive patients undergoing bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) treated with either provisional stenting or a planned mini-crush strategy. True bifurcation lesions were classified according to the Medina classification, and only those with lesions classified as 1.1.1, 1.0.1, and 0.1.1 were included. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality and target lesion revascularisation (TLR). Time-to-event outcomes were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was performed to identify independent predictors of outcomes. A prespecified subgroup analysis was conducted for patients with true bifurcation lesions (Medina 1.1.1).

Results

A total of 157 patients (92 with provisional stenting and 65 with mini-crush) were included, with a median follow-up exceeding seven years. Event-free survival did not differ significantly between the two techniques (log-rank p = 0.738). In multivariable analysis, after adjusting for age, prior PCI, multivessel disease, and lesion complexity, the stenting technique was not independently associated with the composite endpoint (adjusted HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.49-2.27; p = 0.90). In the Medina 1.1.1 subgroup, long-term mortality and TLR rates were also comparable across strategies.

Conclusion

In our real-world cohort, both mini-crush and provisional stenting strategies were associated with similar long-term clinical outcomes. After adjusting for patient and lesion complexity, the stenting technique did not predict long-term prognosis, suggesting that anatomical and clinical factors may outweigh procedural strategy in bifurcation PCI.

View source

Similar papers

Open access Oct 2026

Long term results after percutanous coronary intervention in large cohort of coronary bifurcation lesions in large volume center in single versus double stenting

A large cohort has shown that single stenting strategies was associated with significantly better outcome than double stenting strategies, and survival analysis has shown a superior outcome in terms of occurrence of MACE in single stenting versus double stenting.

D. Laohachewin, P. Kulyassa, A. Gueleroglu et al. · 0 citations
Oct 2026

Bailout stenting strategy in complex femoropopliteal lesions: mid-term outcomes with drug-eluting versus bare-metal stents.

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to compare mid-term outcomes of drug-eluting stents (DES) versus bare-metal stents (BMS) when used as a bailout strategy for complex femoropopliteal lesions in real-world practice. METHODS Single-center, retrospective cohort (January 2018 - February 2025) including patients requir...

Gladiol Zenunaj, Roberta Ricci, G. Baldazzi et al. · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

Long-Term Outcomes According to the Initially Intended Stenting Strategy for Unprotected Distal Left Main Bifurcation PCI: A Single-Centre Retrospective Cohort Study

Background: Optimal stenting for distal unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) bifurcation disease remains uncertain. We evaluated long-term outcomes by initially intended strategy. Methods: This retrospective, single-centre cohort included 234 consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (P...

Zafer Guven, H. O. Arabacı, H. Yalman et al. · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

Comparison of 1- versus 2-stent strategy for bifurcation lesions in complex and high-risk indicated patients

Optimal stenting strategies for bifurcation lesions in Complex and High-risk Indicated Patients (CHIP) remain unclear. This study aimed to compare long-term clinical outcomes between 1- and 2-stent strategies for bifurcation lesions in a well-defined CHIP cohort. We performed a propensity score–matc...

Хонг Сик Парк · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Drug-Coated Balloon Versus Stenting for Medina 0.0.1 Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: One-Year Clinical and Angiographic Outcomes of a Leave-Nothing-Behind Strategy.

BACKGROUND The optimal treatment for isolated side-branch coronary bifurcation lesions (Medina 0.0.1) remains debated. Drug-coated balloons (DCB) offer a "leave-nothing-behind" alternative to drug-eluting stents (DES), but comparative data for this specific lesion subset is limited. AIMS This study aimed to compare t...

A. Gad, Mohamed Mohamed Hal, M. Mokarrab et al. · 0 citations
Sep 2026

Minicrush or T-Stenting and Minimal Protrusion in Complex Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: The Multicenter TREX Registry.

BACKGROUND Percutaneous coronary intervention of complex coronary bifurcation lesions frequently requires an upfront 2-stent strategy. Although the double kissing crush technique has been extensively studied, limited contemporary data are available comparing alternative 2-stent approaches, particularly Minicrush and T-...

Giulio Piedimonte, Enrico Cerrato, L. Azzalini et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.