Sep 2026· Cardiovascular Journal of Africa· Vol 37 3, pp.
396-403
· 0 citations
Medicine
TL;DR
In a real-world cohort of patients undergoing bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention, both mini-crush and provisional stenting strategies were associated with similar long-term clinical outcomes and the stenting technique did not predict long-term prognosis.
Abstract
Background
The optimal stenting strategy for coronary bifurcation lesions remains a topic of debate, particularly regarding the long-term comparative effectiveness of mini-crush and provisional techniques.
Methods
We analysed consecutive patients undergoing bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) treated with either provisional stenting or a planned mini-crush strategy. True bifurcation lesions were classified according to the Medina classification, and only those with lesions classified as 1.1.1, 1.0.1, and 0.1.1 were included. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality and target lesion revascularisation (TLR). Time-to-event outcomes were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was performed to identify independent predictors of outcomes. A prespecified subgroup analysis was conducted for patients with true bifurcation lesions (Medina 1.1.1).
Results
A total of 157 patients (92 with provisional stenting and 65 with mini-crush) were included, with a median follow-up exceeding seven years. Event-free survival did not differ significantly between the two techniques (log-rank p = 0.738). In multivariable analysis, after adjusting for age, prior PCI, multivessel disease, and lesion complexity, the stenting technique was not independently associated with the composite endpoint (adjusted HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.49-2.27; p = 0.90). In the Medina 1.1.1 subgroup, long-term mortality and TLR rates were also comparable across strategies.
Conclusion
In our real-world cohort, both mini-crush and provisional stenting strategies were associated with similar long-term clinical outcomes. After adjusting for patient and lesion complexity, the stenting technique did not predict long-term prognosis, suggesting that anatomical and clinical factors may outweigh procedural strategy in bifurcation PCI.
A large cohort has shown that single stenting strategies was associated with significantly better outcome than double stenting strategies, and survival analysis has shown a superior outcome in terms of occurrence of MACE in single stenting versus double stenting.
D. Laohachewin, P. Kulyassa, A. Gueleroglu et al.· European Heart Journal· 0 citations
BACKGROUND
The aim of this study was to compare mid-term outcomes of drug-eluting stents (DES) versus bare-metal stents (BMS) when used as a bailout strategy for complex femoropopliteal lesions in real-world practice.
METHODS
Single-center, retrospective cohort (January 2018 - February 2025) including patients requir...
Gladiol Zenunaj, Roberta Ricci, G. Baldazzi et al.· Journal of Cardiovascular Su...· 0 citations
Optimal stenting strategies for bifurcation lesions in Complex and High-risk Indicated Patients (CHIP) remain unclear.
This study aimed to compare long-term clinical outcomes between 1- and 2-stent strategies for bifurcation lesions in a well-defined CHIP cohort.
We performed a propensity score–matc...
Хонг Сик Парк· European Heart Journal· 0 citations
BACKGROUND
The optimal treatment for isolated side-branch coronary bifurcation lesions (Medina 0.0.1) remains debated. Drug-coated balloons (DCB) offer a "leave-nothing-behind" alternative to drug-eluting stents (DES), but comparative data for this specific lesion subset is limited.
AIMS
This study aimed to compare t...
A. Gad, Mohamed Mohamed Hal, M. Mokarrab et al.· Catheterization and cardiova...· 0 citations
BACKGROUND
Percutaneous coronary intervention of complex coronary bifurcation lesions frequently requires an upfront 2-stent strategy. Although the double kissing crush technique has been extensively studied, limited contemporary data are available comparing alternative 2-stent approaches, particularly Minicrush and T-...
Giulio Piedimonte, Enrico Cerrato, L. Azzalini et al.· Circulation. Cardiovascular...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.