The results show that learned ambiguity radii can recover most of the performance of strong fixed-radius DRO while reducing unnecessary conservatism and improving regime adaptivity.
Abstract
Predict-then-optimize systems usually compress uncertainty into a point forecast and then solve a downstream optimization problem as if the forecast were reliable. Distributionally robust optimization (DRO) offers protection against misspecification, but the ambiguity set is often centered at historical samples and uses a fixed radius. We propose \emph{learned predictive ambiguity sets} (LPAS): a deep contextual model outputs a finite nominal scenario distribution, a state-dependent Wasserstein radius, and optionally an anisotropic ground metric. These outputs define a contextual ambiguity set that feeds a DRO decision layer. The radius is trained by a combination of conditional quantile calibration, size regularization, and downstream decision loss, so that robustness is adaptive rather than globally fixed. We derive the finite dual form used by the decision layer, present a staged training algorithm, and evaluate the method on distributionally robust portfolio optimization with 20 S&P 500 constituents from 2018--2026. The proposed method substantially improves over equal-weight, predict-then-optimize, and historical Wasserstein DRO baselines, achieving 26.28% annualized return, Sharpe ratio 1.30, final wealth 1.61, and lower tail loss than a deep fixed-radius DRO baseline while using a smaller average radius. The results show that learned ambiguity radii can recover most of the performance of strong fixed-radius DRO while reducing unnecessary conservatism and improving regime adaptivity.
A more flexible framework in which a predictive model determines the nominal distribution and a separate model estimates a data-dependent radius is developed, which treats calibration as a practical mechanism for reliable decision making rather than a universal guarantee of improved optimization performance.
This work proposes an integrated learning and robust optimization (ILRO) framework, where a robust decision problem is used both to define the training problem (termed the RSPO loss problem), and to produce the deployed decision, which achieves both robustness and learning-decision alignment.
Chengpeng Tan, Yuchen Mao, Shu-Ming Wang et al.· 0 citations
It is shown that BiCS is applicable to standard DRO, almost-sure DRO, DRO with various chance constraints, and DRO with ambiguity sets strengthened by local information, and demonstrates superior performance, including solving cases where the examined compact reformulations are unavailable or computationally difficult.
Causal Structure-guided DRO (CS-DRO) is proposed, which estimates a directed acyclic graph (DAG) that encodes the predictive relationships between representations and labels, serving as a proxy for causal structure shared across source domains.
Seonggyeom Kim, Eunjung Choi, Dong-Kyu Chae· Proceedings of the 32nd ACM...· 0 citations
This paper proposes a biobjective formulation that balances prediction accuracy and cost minimization, termed decision-driven regularization, which is shown to be numerically superior to other benchmarks, such as ordinary least squares, random forest, XGBoost, SPO+, perturbation gradient, and learning and rank, in the...
G. Loke, Qin-Shen Tang, Yangge Xiao et al.· INFORMS journal on computing· 1 citation
A decision-aware weak-to-strong (W2S) framework that leverages both labeled and unlabeled data to improve contextual stochastic optimization and establishes a non-asymptotic upper bound on the excess decision risk of W2S and a complementary lower bound for a strong-only benchmark.
Jingwei Ji, Renyuan Xu· arXiv.org· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.