Jul 2026· Production and operations management· 0 citations
TL;DR
It is established that CGD converges to a neighborhood of the global optimum when the loss function exhibits sufficient strong convexity, and the derived bounds reveal a key insight: the strength of convexity in the loss function can compensate for the uncertainty introduced by decision-dependent effects.
Abstract
In this paper, we study contextual stochastic optimization (CSO), where decisions are made under uncertainty and the distribution of random parameters can be partially inferred from covariates observed prior to decision-making. In many practical settings, these distributions also depend on the decisions themselves, a phenomenon known as the
decision-dependent effect
. Most existing studies address this issue by imposing structural assumptions on the relationship between decisions and the underlying distributions. However, such assumptions may lead to model misspecification when the true relationship deviates from the assumed form. A prominent alternative is the weighted sample average approximation (wSAA) method proposed by Bertsimas and Kallus (2019), which adapts sample weights based on their similarity to the current decision–context pair. Nevertheless, because these weights are typically computed using complex machine learning models and depend on the decision variables in decision-dependent settings, solving the resulting optimization problem becomes computationally challenging. To overcome this challenge, we extend the wSAA framework from the loss function to its gradient, leading to the notion of the
contextual gradient
. We show that the contextual gradient serves as a meaningful indicator of optimality and leverage this property to develop the
contextual gradient descent (CGD)
algorithm. Our analysis establishes that CGD converges to a neighborhood of the global optimum when the loss function exhibits sufficient strong convexity. Moreover, the derived bounds reveal a key insight: the strength of convexity in the loss function can compensate for the uncertainty introduced by decision-dependent effects. Extensive numerical experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate that CGD consistently outperforms existing methods for contextual optimization under decision-dependent uncertainty.
This paper proposes a biobjective formulation that balances prediction accuracy and cost minimization, termed decision-driven regularization, which is shown to be numerically superior to other benchmarks, such as ordinary least squares, random forest, XGBoost, SPO+, perturbation gradient, and learning and rank, in the...
G. Loke, Qin-Shen Tang, Yangge Xiao et al.· INFORMS journal on computing· 1 citation
This work proposes an integrated learning and robust optimization (ILRO) framework, where a robust decision problem is used both to define the training problem (termed the RSPO loss problem), and to produce the deployed decision, which achieves both robustness and learning-decision alignment.
Chengpeng Tan, Yuchen Mao, Shu-Ming Wang et al.· 0 citations
A decision-aware weak-to-strong (W2S) framework that leverages both labeled and unlabeled data to improve contextual stochastic optimization and establishes a non-asymptotic upper bound on the excess decision risk of W2S and a complementary lower bound for a strong-only benchmark.
This work shows that a distance-minimization-based CE is mathematically equivalent to the maximum a posteriori estimate of a Gibbs posterior within the generalized Bayes framework, and introduces two decision rules beyond MAP within a unified framework.
A distributionally robust framework based on optimal transport (OT) for harnessing such heterogeneous data in conditional optimization and demonstrating the value of the framework through a conditional assortment problem using demand and product-feature data from multiple stores is demonstrated.
This work proposes \texttt{RADAR} (Regret-based Assessment of Decision Adequacy and Risk), a decision-focused framework that uses inverse optimization to infer latent preferences and tests the deployed decision's optimality gap under the current distribution.
Minxing Zheng, H. Wiberg, Shixiang Zhu· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.