Aug 2026· International Conference on Circuit, Power and Computing Technologies· pp. 634-639· 0 citations· 21 references
Abstract
Training machine learning models across many institutions without moving raw data is attractive in theory, but the standard Federated Learning setup hands enormous power to one central aggregation server that participants must trust blindly. what happens when that trust assumption is violated and build a system, that does not require it. couples a four-layer distributed architecture with three stacked privacy mechanisms Local Differential Privacy to bound what any single gradient reveals, Secure Multi-Party Computation via the SecAgg protocol so the aggregation server never sees individual updates, and Tendermint-BFT blockchain consensus to create a tamper-evident audit log that no single party controls. Our main technical contribution is a formal proof that the combination of LDP and SecAgg satisfies end-to-end $(\varepsilon, \delta)$-differential privacy, including the SecAgg masking step cannot degrade the DP guarantee already earned by LDP noise injection. On CIFAR-10 with a ResNet-18 under three Dirichlet non-IID splits tested on real cluster hardware, reached 78.3% accuracy at $\varepsilon=0.83$ against six baselines including FedProx and SCAFFOLD-two standard non-IID benchmarks that prior blockchain FL work has consistently omitted.
Federated learning is a decentralised machine-learning approach in which several clients jointly build a shared model without moving their raw data to one location. Rising concerns around privacy, tightening regulation, and restrictions on how data may be owned or shared have made this approach increasingly attractive...
Shyam Patel, S. Khan· 2026 International Conferenc...· 0 citations
Federated learning (FL) is a machine learning technique where multiple clients with local data collaborate in training a machine learning model. However, this centralization of sensitive model updates incurs security and privacy issues. A malicious aggregator can launch inference attacks to violate the privacy of clien...
Jia-Ming Fang· 2026 3rd World Conference on...· 0 citations
This SoK model federated learning as an append-only transcript of submissions, admissions, aggregation, and finalization events, and formalize verifiability as a collection of integrity claims issued by clients and the aggregator, and checked by different verifier classes.
Andrea Rizzini, Marco Esposito, Tommaso Gagliardoni et al.· Proceedings on Privacy Enhan...· 0 citations
This work proposes PRoVeFL-a novel, modular FL framework that is Privacy-preserving, Byzantine-Robust, and ensures Verifiable aggregation, and improves runtime over the prior works, Prio and ELSA, based on distributed trust with comparable security guarantees, up to 100x and 10x, respectively.
Harsh Kasyap, Anil Kumar Pradhan, U. Atmaca et al.· 0 citations
Federated Learning (FL) enables collaborative model training without centralizing client data, making it well-suited for privacy-sensitive domains. Existing approaches use techniques such as homomorphic encryption, differential privacy, and secure multi-party computation to mitigate attacks including model inversion, m...
Sahar Ghoflsaz Ghinani, Elaheh Sadredini· International Conference on...· 0 citations
This paper presents a privacy-by-design federated learning reference architecture for customer intelligence across telecom networks, in which each operator trains locally on its own CRM, billing, service-interaction, and network-telemetry data and shares only encrypted model updates, never raw records.
Brahmananda Naidu Dabbara· International journal of com...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.