Jul 2026· Structural Health Monitoring· 1 citation· 34 references
TL;DR
A novel identification approach utilizing a deep learning-based ensemble method combined with tailored pre- and post-processing techniques offers a robust solution for analyzing complex AE signals and provides new insights into the intrinsic mechanisms of AE activity in composite structures.
Abstract
Acoustic emission (AE) enables real-time structural health monitoring with high sensitivity. However, overlapping signals from multiple concurrent sources—known as mixed-mode AE—pose major challenges for accurate damage classification. This paper presents a novel identification approach utilizing a deep learning-based ensemble method combined with tailored pre- and post-processing techniques. By segmenting time–frequency spectrograms of AE hits into frequency bands, the convolutional neural networks ensemble effectively extracts features to distinguish constituent damage modes within mixed signals. Among several architectures evaluated, DenseNet achieved the highest classification accuracy, exceeding 98.86% on independent test data. Information entropy analysis further confirmed clear spectral distinctions between pure-mode and mixed-mode AE signals, consistent with theoretical predictions. Model interpretability analysis elucidated the basis for model decisions and directions for improvement. Leveraging the reliable predictions, the coupling relationships between damage modes were deduced, and the finite element method was introduced to further explain the physical essence of coupling transformation, revealing the decisive role of the out-of-plane peeling stress in adhesive debonding and fiber breakage. Additionally, Gaussian process regression (GPR) models verified the existence of the mixed-mode signal formation pattern. Overall, the proposed method offers a robust solution for analyzing complex AE signals and provides new insights into the intrinsic mechanisms of AE activity in composite structures.
Reliable in situ monitoring is essential for the improvement of process supervision, quality assurance, and machine-state recognition in additive manufacturing of smart composite systems. This study presents a non-invasive acoustic–vibration side-channel monitoring framework for identifying FDM printing cases using exp...
T. Mahmood, O. Abdullah, A. Hadi et al.· Journal of Composites Scienc...· 0 citations
A novel temporal-modal parallel convolutional neural network framework that integrates temporal information with modal characteristics for enhanced structural damage detection and enables more accurate and robust damage identification is proposed.
Dongxue Li, Ying-ni He, Likai Zhang et al.· Structural Health Monitoring· 0 citations
Multi-sensor acoustic emission (AE) source classification typically reconstructs multi-channel transient hits into graph-level samples to integrate transient waveforms with sensor topology information. However, the event reconstruction process may also introduce non-waveform structural confounders, such as trigger chan...
Yong-Chao Liu, Dongming Hou, Wentao Wang et al.· Smart materials and structur...· 0 citations
Acoustic emission (AE) monitoring is a method of structural health
monitoring that relies on the detection of elastic waves generated by the release
of concentrated strain energy when damage is created in a structural material.
One of its strengths is that registered waveforms can, in theory, be used to
draw conclusion...
Leonard Hohaus, Christos Kassapoglou, Loftfollah Pahlavan· e-Journal of Nondestructive...· 0 citations
This protocol provides a robust non-contact strategy for insulation fault diagnosis and condition monitoring of electrical power equipment by extracting and fusing time- and frequency-domain acoustic features for automated fault classification.
Weifeng Chen, Chunguang Hou, Yu Gu et al.· Journal of Visualized Experi...· 0 citations