Skip to content
Review Open access

Comparing frailty and health outcomes in AYA cancer survivors to propensity-matched non-cancer controls: A secondary analysis of NHANES data.

Oct 2026 · JCO Oncology Practice · 0 citations

Abstract

652 Background: Adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer survivors demonstrate high survival rates; however, many experience late and long-term effects of cancer and cancer treatment. Frailty provides a comprehensive framework for describing cancer-related health decline in this high-risk population. This study examined whether frailty and related health-outcomes (i.e., comorbidity count, self-reported health status, and occupational limitations) differed between AYA survivors and propensity-matched non-cancer controls. Methods: This was a cross-sectional, secondary analysis of data collected from AYA cancer survivors, diagnosed between 15-39 years of age who participated in NHANES (1999-2018), a U.S. health survey. All cancer types, except non-melanoma skin cancers, were included. A 37-item frailty index was constructed (score range: 0–1; categories: robust <0.20, pre-frail 0.20–0.35, frail >0.35). Nearest neighbor propensity score matching (1:5) was conducted. Health outcomes (health status [categorical], comorbidities [count], and occupational limitations [yes/no]) were assessed via self-report. Differences between AYA survivors and matched non-cancer controls were assessed via survey-weighted regression, adjusting for age, sex, race/ethnicity, poverty income ratio, and education. Results: AYA survivors (n=723) and matched controls (n=3,615) were identified. Compared to matched controls, AYA survivors had higher continuous frailty scores (Beta=+0.05, p<0.001) and 89% higher odds of worse frailty category (p<0.001). AYA survivors had 46% more comorbidities (p<0.001), 84% higher odds of worse self-reported health (p<0.001), and 95% higher odds of occupational limitations (p<0.001). Lower poverty income ratio was the strongest predictor of frailty and poorer health outcomes for all variables. Conclusions: AYA cancer survivors demonstrated worse frailty and health outcomes when compared to non-cancer controls. Frailty indices may capture cancer-related health decline and may serve as a clinically actionable tool to identify survivors at risk of poor outcomes. The strong influence of socioeconomic factors highlights the unique long-term implications of life stage interruptions that AYAs face during and after receiving a cancer diagnosis. Further investigation of these health outcomes and their biological and social underpinnings in AYA survivors is necessary to support the development of tailored survivorship care.

Read PDF

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.