Skip to content
#federated learning Open access

Decentralized Federated Learning with Differential Privacy for Scientific Data

Aug 2026 · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data

Abstract

This paper presents a novel approach to collaborative scientific data analysis leveraging Decentralized Federated Learning with Differential Privacy (DFLDP). The core challenge in many scientific domains is the reluctance to share raw data due to stringent privacy regulations and intellectual property protections. Traditional Federated Learning (FL) solutions, while offering a degree of data privacy, still rely on centralized aggregation, a point of vulnerability. Our proposed DFLDP framework addresses this limitation by adopting a decentralized architecture where individual researchers maintain complete control over their datasets. Crucially, we integrate differential privacy mechanisms directly into the aggregation process, adding a quantifiable layer of protection against data leakage. This ensures that the learned model benefits from the collective knowledge of multiple researchers without revealing individual data contributions. The system utilizes a gossip-based communication protocol for model updates, minimizing communication overhead. We formally define the mathematical framework, outlining the key components and their interactions. The system's performance is evaluated in a simulated environment, demonstrating the effectiveness of the DFLDP approach in achieving accurate models while upholding stringent privacy guarantees. The core claim of this work is that sharing raw scientific data for federated learning is often prohibited due to privacy concerns and intellectual property restrictions. The core mechanism implemented is the realization of a federated learning system that utilizes differential privacy to protect data during aggregation, while also employing a decentralized architecture where individual researchers retain control over their data. This new approach combines federated learning with differential privacy and decentralization, enabling collaborative scientific discovery without compromising data privacy or intellectual property rights.

View source

Similar papers

#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2014

Software development in startup companies: A systematic mapping study

The results indicate that software engineering work practices are chosen opportunistically, adapted and configured to provide value under the constrains imposed by the startup context.

Nicolò Paternoster, Carmine Giardino, M. Unterkalmsteiner et al. · 394 citations · ⚡54
#machine learning Review Open access Jun 2014

Why Early-Stage Software Startups Fail: A Behavioral Framework

This state-of-practice investigation was performed using a literature review followed by a multiple-case study approach and presents how inconsistency between managerial strategies and execution can lead to failure by means of a behavioral framework.

Carmine Giardino, Xiaofeng Wang, P. Abrahamsson · 175 citations · ⚡19
#machine learning Review Open access Oct 2016

“Failures” to be celebrated: an analysis of major pivots of software startups

This study conducts a case survey study based on the secondary data of the major pivots happened in 49 software startups, and demonstrates that customer need pivot is the most common among all pivot types.

Sohaib Shahid Bajwa, Xiaofeng Wang, Anh Nguyen-Duc et al. · 127 citations · ⚡15
#machine learning Review Open access May 2016

Key Challenges in Software Startups Across Life Cycle Stages

It is found that what perceived as biggest challenges by software startups do vary across different life cycle stages, even though its significance decreases when the learning focuses of the startups move from problem to solution and their products mature.

Xiaofeng Wang, Henry Edison, Sohaib Shahid Bajwa et al. · 62 citations · ⚡6

Related blog posts

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.