Skip to content
Open access

Early clinical outcomes after robotic-assisted medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty according to age: a retrospective cohort study

Oct 2026 · BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders · 0 citations

TL;DR

In selected patients undergoing medial RA-UKA, no statistically significant age-group differences in measured early outcomes were detected during the first month, and serial observations provide reference points for early postoperative counselling but do not establish equivalent recovery or comparative safety.

Abstract

Evidence describing recovery during the first month after robotic-assisted medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (RA-UKA) across age groups is limited. We compared pain, active knee motion, function, and satisfaction in patients aged < 65 and ≥ 65 years. In this single-centre retrospective cohort, 358 patients were screened; 34 were excluded from the analytic cohort on the basis of pre-existing eligibility criteria, and 23 of the remaining 324 did not attend day-30 follow-up. The principal analysis included 301 patients (146 aged < 65 years; 155 aged ≥ 65 years) who underwent medial RA-UKA between April 2024 and November 2025. Pain at rest on a visual analog scale (VAS) and active knee range of motion were assessed at baseline, on postoperative days 1 and 3, and at approximately days 14 and 30. Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and Knee Society scores were assessed at baseline and the outpatient visits. Baseline-adjusted linear mixed-effects models estimated age-group differences. Adjusted day-30 VAS and WOMAC contrasts were designated co-primary during revision (Bonferroni threshold, P  < 0.025 each). Sensitivity analyses included available observations from non-completers and adjustment for American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class. Mean VAS decreased and active knee motion increased in both groups during the first month. The adjusted day-30 differences (Older minus Younger) were − 0.030 VAS points (95% CI − 0.220 to + 0.161; P  = 0.760) and − 0.447 WOMAC points (95% CI − 1.526 to + 0.631; P  = 0.416); neither met the revised significance threshold. Group-by-visit interactions were not statistically significant for VAS (F (3, 897) = 0.517; P  = 0.670) or WOMAC (F (1, 299) = 0.023; P  = 0.879). Among day-30 completers, 144/146 Younger patients (98.6%) and 154/155 Older patients (99.4%) reported satisfaction scores of 4 or 5 (absolute difference + 0.7% points; 95% CI − 2.4 to + 4.3). All 23 non-completers lacked day-30 outcome and satisfaction data. In selected patients undergoing medial RA-UKA, no statistically significant age-group differences in measured early outcomes were detected during the first month. These serial observations provide reference points for early postoperative counselling but do not establish equivalent recovery or comparative safety.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Aug 2026

Mid-term results about first 106 patient cohort after robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) with ROSA knee system

ROSA® rTKA demonstrated satisfactory mid-term radiological outcomes, with accurate implant alignment and a low complication rate, and long-term comparative studies are needed to determine its superiority over conventional TKA techniques.

B. Alcobía-Díaz, R. García-Crespo, Laura Barragán-del Baño et al. · 0 citations
Sep 2026

DOES ROBOTIC ASSISTANCE IMPROVE EARLY FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES FOLLOWING UNICOMPARTMENTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY?

Robotic assistance is purported to confer benefit in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) due to an assumed correlation between higher surgical precision and superior outcomes. Our aim was to compare early patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) between robotic-assisted and manual UKA in our high-volume arthropla...

M. Fullarton, N. Ohly, S. Chopra et al. · 0 citations
Open access Oct 2026

Substantial improvement in short-term survivorship in patients receiving robotic arm-assisted medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Aims Robotic arm-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (R-UKA) has been shown to improve alignment and accuracy of component placement compared with conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (C-UKA). Despite this, there is conflicting evidence for whether this has an impact on revision rates. Methods We per...

T. Cheok, K. Law, Julie F. Vermeir et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Preoperative Medial Proximal Tibial Angle Does Not Influence Clinical Outcomes Following Mobile-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to evaluate whether preoperative medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) influences clinical outcomes following mobile-bearing medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). METHODS This retrospective study included 454 consecutive patients who had antero-medial osteoarthritis and u...

Tomofumi Kinoshita, K. I. Bunyoz, Kristian R. L. Mortensen et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Twenty-Year Clinical, Functional, and Radiographic Outcomes of Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Background: Hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) was developed as a bone-preserving alternative to conventional total hip arthroplasty (THA), particularly for young and physically active patients. However, concerns regarding metal-on-metal bearings have substantially restricted its use. This study evaluated the long-term...

G. Rovere, Davide Luziatelli, Sandro Luziatelli et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.