Papers that address the orchestration of teams by synthesizing their workflows into a coherent whole, whether these teams are composed of human, machine, Generative AI (gen-AI), robot or AI-Agentic members are proposed.
Abstract
For our Special Interest Group (S.I.G.), we propose papers that address the orchestration of teams by synthesizing their workflows into a coherent whole, whether these teams are composed of human, machine, Generative AI (gen-AI), robot or AI-Agentic members. The bigger picture of interdependence, teamwork and Gen-AI indicates the need by organizations to build a library of human and artificial agents with bidirectional agency (responsibility) to achieve operational goals (missions), considering agentic risk tolerances, available skills, and vulnerabilities across a complex trade space among the skills available versus those needed for the tasks assigned to complete an operation. In this trade space, agents (human or artificial) from multiple systems with the requisite skills to accomplish a designated task and timeline combined to form a hierarchy of humans, robots, machines and AI. This complex system produces workflows that must be synthesized into a unit(s), then orchestrated to accomplish the goals assigned to it, yet remain trusted even in competitive and uncertain environments. Once synthesized into a unit (e.g., a team), Gen-AI provides the opportunity to not only advance the science of teams by orchestrating team products and performances, but also has raised several concerns (viz., AI used for deception, superintelligence, blackmail, or existential threats to humans). For our S.I.G., We are interested in orchestrating teams: What are the benefits, drawbacks, and, most importantly, can humans, machines and Agentic AI be synthesized and managed (orchestrated)?
Large language models (LLMs) have evolved from standalone generative systems into agentic AI systems capable of planning, reasoning, tool use, and multi-agent collaboration. Enterprises are increasingly adopting AI agents to automate and orchestrate complex workflows, from IT operations to employee productivity. While early deployments focused on proof-of-concept prototypes, the past year has marked a clear shift toward production-grade enterprise AI agents. This transition has been enabled by a wave of new technologies, including multi-agent orchestration, memory and state management, skill-based and modular agent architectures, and deeper integration with enterprise data and workflow platforms, which together make scalable, reliable agent systems feasible in practice. At the same time, moving agents into production introduces new technical and organizational challenges, such as rigorous evaluation and benchmarking, security and governance, and system design for long-running, autonomous operation. Building on the success of our two prior highly attended editions: ''Agentic AI for Enterprise'' workshop at KDD 2025 and ''Enterprise RAG'' workshop at CIKM 2024, this workshop aims to bring together researchers and practitioners to examine how enterprise AI agents can successfully move from prototypes to production. We focus on three pillars: 1) Agent architectures and systems; 2) Enterprise applications and deployments; 3) Evaluation and governance.
Min Du, Anbang Xu, Jasmine Jaksic et al.· Proceedings of the 32nd ACM...· 0 citations
This workshop aims to define a roadmap for a world where AI Teammates and human developers build the future together, anchored by the launch of the AIDev dataset, which provides the empirical evidence needed to understand the behaviors of AI Teammates.
Hao Li, Haoxiang Zhang, Jie M. Zhang et al.· Proceedings of the 32nd ACM...· 1 citation
Agentic AI frameworks interpret open-ended task goals and decompose them into multi-step plans. Richer information about embodiment-specific capabilities, physical preconditions, and cross-robot coordination improves grounding, but does not eliminate infeasible, mistimed, or unsafe physical actions. Physical robot crews therefore require an explicit architectural interface between semantic planning and execution, where every planned action is verified against robot capabilities, system state, and workflow constraints before actuation. This paper introduces Physical Agentic AI, a framework for skill-grounded robot agent orchestration, in which each robot exposes a typed library of executable skills while a foundation model planner decomposes a task into phases and assigns each phase to a robot-skill pair. A Robot Orchestration layer exposes the skill library, robot state, named locations, and workflow contracts to a non-actuating Mission Planner, while a deterministic Robot Orchestrator validates and authorizes one skill at a time. We evaluate on a drone-UGV search-and-dispatch mission, where every mission in every condition is executed live in Gazebo, and on a humanoid-quadruped transportation task using hardware-equivalent skill interfaces plus two physical trials on a Unitree G1 and Go2. Varying planner knowledge and runtime enforcement independently, we find that retrieval raises skill grounding from 51% to 96% yet leaves informed planners dispatching 23-29% of faulted steps. Per-dispatch enforcement reduces false dispatch to 0% with no false blocks, and a held-plan ablation confirms that the gate, not plan variation, is responsible. Live execution makes the difference physical: without enforcement all eight injected faults crossed the orchestration boundary and six produced robot motion; with enforcement all eight were refused before motion.
Xinyuan Liu, Eren Sadikoglu, R. Chatterjee et al.· 0 citations
This paper examines the phase transition from deterministic algorithmic execution (DevOps) to probabilistic socio-technical orchestration (AgentOps) and synthesizes evolutionary biology and Hellenistic philosophy to reframe human-agent teaming as the integration of a synthetic symbiote.
Svetlana Meissner· TH Wildau Engineering and Na...· 0 citations
This hands-on tutorial introduces LangGraph, a framework built on top of LangChain for designing and orchestrating stateful agentic AI workflows that support complex reasoning workflows, adaptive execution paths, and collaborative multi-agent architectures.
Mohammad Amin Kuhail· Proceedings of the 32nd ACM...· 0 citations
Agentic AI systems that reason, plan, and act on complex goals have advanced rapidly across software engineering, scientific discovery, drug development, healthcare, finance, and social simulation. Across these domains a single failure pattern recurs: current systems can execute tasks competently but often struggle to determine when to act, when to pause, when to change strategy, and when to involve a human. Existing reviews catalog agentic architectures, taxonomies, and limitations, but none specify what capabilities these systems must acquire to support dynamic human-AI collaboration. We address that gap. We define collaborative AI as a class of systems that combine generative exploration with autonomous action and calibrate between them based on context, uncertainty, and task demands. We identify four required capabilities: metacognition, contextual mode-switching, uncertainty-aware action, and adaptive human collaboration. We relate these capabilities to established multi-agent systems foundations, including belief-desire-intention architectures, adjustable autonomy, mixed-initiative interaction, and decentralized decision-theoretic control, while specifying the distinct challenges that LLM-based agents introduce. Across the six domains reviewed here, these gaps appear repeatedly and are not solved by current architectures, which positions collaborative AI as a concrete near-term research objective.
Nalan Karunanayake, Savindu Nanayakkara, Kasun Gayashan Hettihewa et al.· International Journal of Net...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.
