The ARIA framework for MAS-agnostic runtime inspection and amendment is developed, designed to integrate with any MAS that exposes execution trajectories and supports continuation replacement, and a compact model is taught to recognize when intervention is needed and how to correct an ongoing run.
Abstract
In LLM-based multi-agent systems (MAS), a local mistake can propagate as other agents build on it, turning a correctable error into a failed task. Diagnosing completed runs or repeatedly re-executing them to search for corrections does not provide a learned policy for intervening while execution is still in progress. We present Agent Runtime Inspection and Amendment (ARIA), a framework for learning when and how to repair ongoing multi-agent executions. Our key intuition is to turn execution-verified repairs into reusable supervision, moving repair search into data construction and training so that a learned model can intervene at runtime without repeatedly testing alternatives. First, we collect over 24{,}000 successful and failed trajectories across four multi-agent frameworks, six benchmarks, and eight host models. From these trajectories, we construct the ARIA dataset, to our knowledge the first large-scale dataset pairing failed multi-agent trajectories with execution-verified repairs. It contains 3{,}953 verified repair pairs, each specifying what went wrong, where to intervene, and how execution should continue. Then, we develop the ARIA framework for MAS-agnostic runtime inspection and amendment, designed to integrate with any MAS that exposes execution trajectories and supports continuation replacement. Using verified repairs as training examples, we teach a compact model to recognize when intervention is needed and how to correct an ongoing run. The aim is to learn repair strategies that apply to related failures in new configurations, rather than merely reproduce individual corrections. Finally, the trained ARIA model demonstrates strong repair performance in both post-hoc and runtime settings, with generalization to unseen frameworks and host models. Our code is available at https://github.com/LabRAI/ARIA.
This work proposes a steering agent that supervises execution on the fly and steers the system back on track when drift occurs, and jointly train the two paths with reinforcement learning, combining a pairwise ranking objective with group-relative policy optimization (GRPO).
Le-Yang Shen, Ya-Xin Gong, Yang Zhang et al.· 0 citations
Results characterize when runtime-controlled composition of coding-agent products improves execution accuracy, as well as when runtime-controlled composition of coding-agent products improves execution accuracy.
Zheng-Yu Chen, Lin-Feng Liu, Hong Li et al.· 0 citations
Large language models (LLMs) have progressively evolved into the core of autonomous agents. Building on this progress, LLM-based multi-agent systems (MAS) coordinate multiple agents into a synergistic team to accomplish complex tasks that exceed the capabilities of individual agents. The effectiveness of such systems d...
Qi-Zhi Chu, Ze-Kai Yu, Si-Jie Wen et al.· 0 citations
Reinforcement learning (RL) has driven substantial progress in coding agents by relying on verified successful trajectories as learning signals. However, such trajectories are scarce in long-horizon software engineering tasks, where a minor error can invalidate the entire rollout. Repeatedly restarting from the initial...
Mengyang Liu, Wei-Ming Wang, Hai-Xin Nan et al.· 1 citation
Multi-agent LLM systems rely on generative models for expert execution, workflow planning, and artifact review. Yet many coordination operations require only bounded decisions, such as selecting the next expert or judging artifact quality. Profiling three representative MAS frameworks, we find that routing and review a...
Kai-Xiang Wang, Zhai-He Zhou, Jiong Lou et al.· 0 citations
A responsiveness evaluation framework that pairs three agent architectures (ReAct, Reflexion, and Plan-and-Execute) with three deterministic synthetic environments (tool planning, debugging, and constraint planning) and injects tool denial, goal modification, or constraint injection at graded severity is presented.