Skip to content
Review

Efficacy of Veliparib Plus Temozolomide Combination Therapy in Cancer: A GRADE-Assessed Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.

Sep 2026 · American Journal of Clinical Oncology · 0 citations · 33 references
Medicine

TL;DR

This meta-analysis did not demonstrate a statistically significant OS and PFS benefit from veliparib plus temozolomide compared with control therapy, and future studies should focus on biomarker-driven approaches and optimized dosing strategies to better define the clinical utility of this regimen.

Abstract

Temozolomide (TMZ) is widely used in aggressive cancers, but its efficacy may be limited by tumor DNA repair mechanisms. Inhibition of PARP with veliparib (ABT-888) has been proposed to enhance TMZ-induced cytotoxicity. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of this combination on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with cancer. PubMed, Scopus, CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically searched up to August 2026, using predefined terms. Eligible studies were phase II and III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating PFS and OS of veliparib combined with temozolomide versus control therapy. Random-effects models with restricted maximum-likelihood (REML) estimation with Hartung-Knapp (HK) adjustment were applied. Statistical analyses were performed with R with significance set at P<0.05. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE framework. From 729 records screened, 4 RCTs enrolling 1022 patients were included. No statistically significant improvement was shown in OS (HR=0.94, 95% CI: 0.78-1.13, I2=0.0) or PFS (HR=0.88, 95% CI: 0.71-1.08, I2=25.5). Subgroup analyses for OS similarly showed no statistically significant benefit. This meta-analysis did not demonstrate a statistically significant OS and PFS benefit from veliparib plus temozolomide compared with control therapy. This finding should be interpreted cautiously. The certainty of evidence was rated as moderate for both OS and PFS according to GRADE. Future studies should focus on biomarker-driven approaches and optimized dosing strategies to better define the clinical utility of this regimen.

View source

Similar papers

Review Sep 2026

Efficacy and Safety of Savolitinib Plus Osimertinib in EGFR-Mutant, MET-Aberrant Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVES NSCLC is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality. While combined therapy including savolitinib and osimertinib appears promising, there exists a lack of comprehensive pooled evidence regarding its anti-oncological activity. The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combined...

Eshal Amir, M. W. Khan, M. S. Mannan et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Efficacy and Safety of Durvalumab and Tremelimumab in Metastatic Non‐Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

ABSTRACT Purpose Immune checkpoint inhibitors have transformed treatment strategies for metastatic non‐small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC). This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of durvalumab combined with tremelimumab compared with those of standard chemotherapy, particularly in patients with low or negative...

Ikhwan Rinaldi, E. R. Yonatan, Tasia Esterita · 0 citations
Review Sep 2026

Clinical Outcomes of Sacituzumab Govitecan in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and GRADE Assessment of Randomized Evidence.

OBJECTIVES Sacituzumab govitecan (SG), a Trop-2-directed antibody-drug conjugate delivering SN-38, has shown promising activity in advanced breast cancer. However, variability across trials and inclusion of nonrandomized data in prior meta-analyses limit the certainty of its efficacy and safety. This study aimed to eva...

M. Amjad, Maryam Rafique, Syeda F. Hussain et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Oct 2026

Comparative efficacy of fruquintinib, regorafenib or TAS-102 in patients with KRAS-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

This study aimed to synthesize evidence from recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy of regorafenib, fruquintinib, and TAS-102 in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Using a network meta-analysis, we compared long-term survival outcomes (overall and progression-free surviva...

Ying-Yu Zhou, Shi-Qing Zhao, Xiao-Yi Zheng et al. · 0 citations
Review Sep 2026

Efficacy and Safety of Sacituzumab Govitecan for Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs).

OBJECTIVES Sacituzumab govitecan (SG), a Trop-2-directed antibody-drug conjugate, has demonstrated clinical activity in HER2-negative breast cancer. Our meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SG compared with standard chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer. METHODS We conducted a comprehensiv...

Lance G. Tolentino, M. Khaustova, Reham Z. Alrwaitey et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Dec 2024

Addition of immune checkpoint inhibitor to standard of care chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Preliminary findings from this study were previously published as a conference abstract (https://doi.org/10.1158/2326-6074.IO2025-B039). Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown activity in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), but their efficacy and safety when integrated with standard chemoradiotherapy (C...

R. Srinivasmurthy, J. Ta, S. Afifi et al. · 3 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.