Internal Reasoning and External Control

Book

CausalT5k Foundation and Development

Preliminary experiments reveal a Four-Quadrant Control Landscape where static audit policies universally fail, a finding that demonstrates CausalT5k ’s value for advancing trustworthy reasoning systems.

Unknown authors · System-2 Reasoning: From Sem... · 0 citations

Save

Copy APA Copied ✓ Copy MLA Copied ✓ Copy BibTeX Copied ✓

Book

RAudit

RAudit, a diagnostic protocol for auditing LLM reasoning without ground truth access, is presented and it is proved bounded correction and O ( log ( 1 /𝜀)) termination are proved.

Unknown authors · System-2 Reasoning: From Sem... · 0 citations

Save

Copy APA Copied ✓ Copy MLA Copied ✓ Copy BibTeX Copied ✓

Open access Jul 2026

Levels of Inference: Identification, Explanation, and the Architecture of Causal Knowledge in Political Science

Gailmard (2026) and Dowding and Miller (2026) draw attention to a methodological gap that political science has yet to adequately address: causal identification, on its own, does not constitute causal explanation. Both contributions help clarify the gap. We extend their analyses in three ways. First, we identify thre...

Dwayne Woods · Chinese Political Science Re... · 0 citations

Save

Copy APA Copied ✓ Copy MLA Copied ✓ Copy BibTeX Copied ✓

Book

Meta-Cognitive Judgment

This chapter provides empirical validation of this book’s System-2 reasoning stack through a human–LLM collaborative attempt to prove the Collatz conjecture, showing that UCCT scope-coverage audits would have detected the false Gap Lemma, RCA trace-scope checking would have caught the 37.5% scope-error rate, and RLER s...

Unknown authors · System-2 Reasoning: From Sem... · 0 citations

Save

Copy APA Copied ✓ Copy MLA Copied ✓ Copy BibTeX Copied ✓

Review Open access 2026

Navigating the Certainty Gap: The Hydraulic Effect of Evidence-Constrained LLMs in Professional Decision-Making

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in high-stakes environments, including infrastructure auditing, medical assessment, legal analysis, and peer review. However, these failures arise less from knowledge limitations than from systematic misinterpretation of modality (fact vs. possibility) and unstable...

Florence Gundidza, Masato Kikuchi, Tadachika Ozono · IEEE Access · 0 citations

Save

Copy APA Copied ✓ Copy MLA Copied ✓ Copy BibTeX Copied ✓

Preprint Aug 2026

Jagged Judges: Epistemic Stability Under Perturbation, Pressure, and Persistence

This is the first apples-to-apples cross-dataset comparison of mechanical, conformity, and persuadability tests in a judging context and identifies baseline jury majority strength as the most effective single-shot signal for anticipating which items wiggle.

Justin Zhao, Himaghna Bhattacharjee, Hannah Korevaar et al. · 0 citations

Save

Copy APA Copied ✓ Copy MLA Copied ✓ Copy BibTeX Copied ✓