Skip to content
Open access

SARIMA Time Series Modeling for Forecasting Malaria Positivity Rate: A Case Study of Kisumu County, Kenya

2026 · International journal of research and innovation in applied science · 0 citations

Abstract

Malaria transmission in Kisumu County, Kenya, follows a seasonal cycle that repeatedly strains health facility capacity, yet routine Kenya Health Information System (KHIS) surveillance data had not previously been applied to systematic short-term forecasting in the County. This study developed and validated a Seasonal Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (SARIMA) model for forecasting monthly malaria positivity rate (MPR) in Kisumu County and extended the analysis to its seven constituent sub-counties: Kisumu Central, Kisumu East, Kisumu West, Nyando, Muhoroni, Nyakach, and Seme. Secondary KHIS data were extracted for 25 health facilities meeting minimum testing-volume and reporting-completeness criteria, covering January 2016 to December 2024. Malaria Positivity Rate was computed as confirmed malaria cases divided by tests conducted, multiplied by 100. Of 2,700 facility-month records, 232 (8.59%) were removed for logical inconsistency, yielding a complete 108-month county time series. The dataset was split into training (January 2016 to December 2023, n=96) and out-of-sample testing (January to December 2024, n=12) periods. Six candidate SARIMA models were compared using the corrected Akaike Information Criterion (AICc) and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC). The optimal model was SARIMA(1,0,1)(0,1,1)[12] (AICc=541.74, BIC=550.95; ar1=0.531, ma1=0.111, sma1=-1.000), with residual adequacy confirmed by the Ljung-Box test (p≈0.42-0.49). County-level forecasts for 2024 achieved a Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 2.27 percentage points, a Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) of 3.01, and a Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) of 9.80%, within the 8-15% benchmark reported for comparable studies. The same model structure was optimal for all seven sub-counties, with sub-county MAPE ranging from 11.05% (Kisumu Central) to 41.54% (Seme), and forecast accuracy directly related to underlying data quality. These findings demonstrate that SARIMA modelling of routine surveillance data provides a practical, low-cost approach to short-term MPR forecasting at both county and sub-county levels, supporting spatially differentiated malaria preparedness planning without requiring additional data collection.

Read PDF

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.