Skip to content
Review Open access

Current evidence on the diagnosis and management of immune checkpoint inhibitor associated myocarditis

Sep 2026 · Discover medicine · Vol 3 · 0 citations · 56 references

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated myocarditis (ICI-M) is a rare but life-threatening immune-related adverse event. Reported mortality ranges from 27 to 50% in earlier cohorts, with a more recent pooled estimate of approximately 26% in systematic reviews incorporating 2021 to 2022 data. Incidence is approximately 1%, rising to 2 to 4% with combination regimens. We performed a narrative review of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, overlap syndromes, risk stratification, diagnostic criteria, and immunosuppressive management of ICI-M. Diagnosis integrates an obligate rise in high-sensitivity troponin with multimodal imaging, framed by the International Cardio-Oncology Society (IC-OS) 2021 criteria and the 2024 American College of Cardiology (ACC) Consensus Pathway, after exclusion of acute coronary syndrome and infectious myocarditis. Risk stratification is discussed using a recently reported multivariable risk score. High-dose intravenous methylprednisolone is the accepted first-line therapy, with observational data associating higher initial dosing with more favourable biomarkers and survival trends. Up to half of severe cases fail first-line therapy and require escalation. Evidence for second-line agents, including mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, abatacept, anti-thymocyte globulin, infliximab, tocilizumab, and ruxolitinib, derives from case series and small cohorts rather than randomised trials, and is presented with that limitation stated. ICI-M requires a structured, multidisciplinary approach integrating early recognition, systematic risk stratification, prompt high-dose immunosuppression, and a structured escalation approach for steroid-refractory disease, recognising that second-line evidence remains limited. This review synthesises the current, largely observational evidence to support individualised multidisciplinary management, and distinguishes guideline-endorsed recommendations from areas resting on limited or emerging data.

Read PDF

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.