Skip to content
Preprint

Physically Constrained Agentic AI for Energy Scheduling

Aug 2026 · 0 citations · 8 references
Engineering Computer Science

TL;DR

These results establish a fail-closed workflow for agentic MIP and MILP energy scheduling under the declared physical model and establish a fail-closed workflow for agentic MIP and MILP energy scheduling under the declared physical model.

Abstract

Agentic AI extends energy management beyond fixed-form interaction by translating natural-language requests into coordinated scheduling actions. We present a hierarchical ReAct Energy Management System (EMS) in which one orchestrator coordinates specialist agent types for shiftable appliances, EV charging, and thermal control. Physical authorization is separated from language generation: a deterministic critic reconstructs each integrated day-ahead candidate and checks its schema, appliance cycles, device power, thermal comfort, and, when active, the whole power feeder limit. Across Qwen 3.5 checkpoints, single-appliance mixed-integer schedules were feasible in 83.3 percent of runs. Localized feedback produced no accepted coupled schedule, whereas a multi-step policy authorized 6/6 current coupled runs: 3/3 for 27B and 3/3 for 35B-A3B. The standard occupied-window policy permits pre-conditioning, enforces comfort from 09:00-18:00. Every accepted schedule passed an independent final replay. Feasible costs were 2522.499 JPY for 27B and 1592.697 JPY for 35B-A3B, which are slightly higher than the mathematical optimization optimum of 1343.380 JPY. These results establish a fail-closed workflow for agentic MIP and MILP energy scheduling under the declared physical model.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Aug 2026

A-CPES: A Reference Framework for Agentic AI in Cyber-Physical Energy Systems

It is argued the loop is indivisible, tune where and how tightly it may close, state eight structural failure modes as falsifiable predictions, and specify six governance modules that rebuild the authorization frame until it covers the loop, before the loop starts turning.

Xiaoyu Zhang, Qiu-Ye Sun, Jiachen Xu et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Strategic Evaluation of Planning Strategies for LLM Agents in Cyber-Physical Systems

A controlled, physics-grounded benchmark built around planning-induced control trajectories: the ordered planning operations and directives through which an execution architecture acts on other agents and the physical process is introduced.

J. de Curtò, I. de Zarzà · 1 citation
Review Jul 2026

LLMs and Agentic AI Systems for Smart Grids: A Tutorial on Architectures and Applications

A solver-grounded design principle is presented: a numerical result is reported only when it originates from a trusted tool and passes explicit verification, and a four-group evaluation framework spanning task utility, solver-grounded correctness, faithfulness and safe failure, and cost and latency is proposed.

Daniel Rojas, Abdulwahab Albassam, Aidan G. Leung et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

LUCID: An Agentic AI Framework on Digital-Twin in the Loop for QoS-Guaranteeing Robotic Control

LUCID is presented, an LLM-agent--orchestrated, uplink-aware cloud-robotics pipeline that moves TP--RRM from solving a fixed formulation to dynamically orchestrating optimization problem schemas within a DITL environment and robustly adapts to changing intents, active-robot counts, and scenes.

Hyeonsu Lyu, Minwoo Kim, Sehyun Ryu et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

FL-MAESTRO: Multi-Agent LLM Orchestration for Resource-Constrained Federated Learning

FL-MAESTRO is proposed, a multi-agent orchestrator that makes the joint runtime FL decision directly through three specialist LLM agents, one per decision dimension, and matches the accuracy of the strongest energy-aware baseline while cutting wasted round energy from over a third to near zero.

Jiajun Wu, Zirui Wang, Jiayu Zhou et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

DARC: A Constraint-Diagnostic LLM Agent Framework for Day-Ahead Dispatch of Campus-Level Integrated Energy Microgrids Under Natural-Language Preferences and Forecast Uncertainty

Day-ahead dispatch of integrated energy systems (IESs) is commonly solved by mixed-integer linear programming when objectives, constraints, and forecasts are fully specified. In practice, however, operators often express temporary preferences in natural language, and day-ahead forecasts inevitably deviate from realized...

Bingnan Li, Yiwei Guo, Huaizhong Hu et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.