Skip to content
Review Open access

Artificial intelligence–enabled electrocardiography for assessment of left ventricular systolic dysfunction in the era of foundation models

Aug 2026 · Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine · Vol 13 · 0 citations · 33 references
Medicine

TL;DR

Adding AI-ECG signals to PREVENT-HF improves near-term heart-failure risk discrimination and reclassification, though without demonstrated benefit on clinical outcomes such as heart-failure hospitalization or mortality.

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) applied to the standard 12-lead electrocardiogram (AI-ECG) is being developed as a scalable approach to screen for left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) and support triage for confirmatory testing. Supervised models trained on paired ECG–echocardiography data show high discrimination for reduced ejection fraction across thresholds and can identify individuals at higher risk of subsequent LV dysfunction despite a normal baseline echocardiogram. External validation of an FDA-cleared ECG-AI device across four geographically diverse U.S. health systems confirmed strong diagnostic accuracy, though signal-format compatibility and quality gating meaningfully affect real-world yield. Two pragmatic randomized trials demonstrate practice-level impact. In primary care, AI-ECG increased the number of new low-ejection-fraction diagnoses and directed echocardiography preferentially to screen-positive patients. In non-cardiology inpatient wards, AI alerts improved diagnostic yield through increased cardiology consultation rather than increased imaging volume. In emergency-department patients with dyspnea, AI-ECG supports a prioritization role with high negative predictive value, outperforming NT-proBNP, but requires confirmatory imaging given prevalence-dependent positive predictive value. In population cohorts, adding AI-ECG signals to PREVENT-HF improves near-term heart-failure risk discrimination and reclassification, though without demonstrated benefit on clinical outcomes such as heart-failure hospitalization or mortality. Foundation models pretrained on large ECG datasets reduce labeled-data requirements and improve transportability, but prospective echocardiography-anchored validation is required before broader deployment. FDA-cleared software is available for left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% screening from 12-lead ECGs as clinician decision support. This review summarizes performance across thresholds and care settings, outlines threshold selection and calibration, and defines priorities for outcome-oriented trials, equitable deployment, and implementation governance.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Aug 2026

Artificial intelligence–enabled electrocardiography for detection of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Artificial intelligence-enhanced electrocardiography demonstrated good diagnostic performance for detecting LVDD and may support future rule-out or risk-enrichment strategies in selected populations, however, current evidence remains insufficient to support routine clinical implementation.

Johann A. C. Edjimbi, Nisarg Shah, L. Donisi et al. · 1 citation
Open access Aug 2026

Prediction of Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction Using an Artificial Intelligence-Based Electrocardiogram Analysis Model in Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department

The AI-ECG model accurately identified LVSD in ED patients in this cohort despite heterogeneous acquisition conditions and retained good discrimination in hemodynamically unstable subgroups, although findings in the smaller hypotensive subgroup should be interpreted as exploratory.

Mi-Jin Lee, Haewon Jung · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Electrocardiography Model for Left Ventricular Systolic and Diastolic Dysfunction Predict Incident Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Sinus Rhythm: A Time-Dependent Analysis

Background/Objectives: Artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiography (AI-ECG) can infer left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) and diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) from a standard 12-lead tracing. Whether these structural AI-ECG scores predict incident atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients in sinus rhythm, and how their predictive value changes over time, is unclear. Methods: In a retrospective single-center cohort of patients with a sinus-rhythm index ECG, AI-ECG LVSD and LVDD scores were derived and dichotomized at prespecified cutoffs (LVSD ≥ 9.7; LVDD ≥ 20.8). The outcome was incident AF, assessed within 30, 90, 180, 270, and 365 days. Discrimination was quantified by the AUROC. Because the proportional hazards assumption was violated, the time course of risk for the joint LVSD × LVDD classification was characterized with window-specific Cox, Aalen additive hazards, and restricted mean survival time analyses. Results: Among 19,593 index ECGs from 18,984 patients, 1190 (6.07%) were followed by incident AF within one year. One-year incidence rose from 4.1% (both negative) to 9.8% (LVSD-positive only), 20.1% (LVDD-positive only), and 19.9% (both positive). Discrimination was highest for early events and attenuated over time, more steeply for LVSD (AUROC 0.803 at 30 days to 0.713 at 365 days) than LVDD (0.817 to 0.764). Combining AI-ECG LVSD and LVDD models, the excess risk conferred by dual positivity was concentrated in the first weeks after the index ECG and, consistently across cumulative Cox, Aalen additive hazards, and restricted mean survival time analyses, converged with that of isolated LVDD positivity by one year. Conclusions: Structural AI-ECG LVSD and LVDD scores from a single sinus-rhythm ECG predict incident AF in a time-dependent manner, with the strongest performance shortly after acquisition and more durable discrimination for LVDD. A single AI-ECG may help target short-term AF surveillance, particularly in patients with combined systolic–diastolic dysfunction.

Kyung Su Kim, J. Son, H. Lee et al. · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

AI-ECG Risk Stratification for Atrial Fibrillation

AI-ECG provides rapid, low-cost AF risk estimation from a single sinus rhythm ECG; however, its predictive performance is modest compared with clinical scores.

Kouki Matsuo, Y. Sobue, T. Miyake et al. · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

Composite Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Electrocardiogram for Detection and Prediction of Structural Heart Disease

A composite artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiogram (AI-ECG) identified prevalent and predicted incident Structural heart disease (SHD) across multinational cohorts, capturing signals beyond its training targets and supporting its potential as a scalable cardiovascular screening tool.

H. Lee, S. Kang, M. Lee et al. · 0 citations
Aug 2026

Utility of ECG-Vision for Surveillance of Left Ventricular Dysfunction in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Initiated on Mavacamten.

In this single-center exploratory cohort of patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy receiving mavacamten, ECG-Vision left ventricular demonstrated high observed sensitivity and negative predictive value for TTE-defined LVSD, although estimates were imprecise because LVSD events were infrequent.

Aakash Bavishi, John Fritzlen, Marybeth Soutar et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.