Skip to content
Open access

The Reverse Calcification Technique (RCT): A Quantitative Parametric Model of Aortic Stenosis Progression.

Aug 2026 · Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology · 0 citations · 32 references
Medicine

TL;DR

The quantitative parametric RCT model demonstrates feasibility for patient-specific estimation of CAVD progression and shows promise for optimizing follow-up intervals.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Aortic stenosis (AS) develops from calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD), which narrows the aortic valve opening as leaflet stiffness increases due to calcium deposition. This study extends the Reverse Calcification Technique (RCT) by incorporating a time dimension to develop a quantitative parametric model for patient-specific prediction of CAVD progression from sequential CT scans.

Methods

Seventeen pre-transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) patients underwent sequential CT scans (1.2-6.5 years); baseline aortic valve calcification (AVC) volumes: ≈ 250 to ≈ 1,600 mm3 (cohort mean ≈  730 mm3 at the first scan and ≈ 920 mm3 at the follow-up scan). A parametric model was developed using two approaches: forward prediction (mild to severe stages) and backward reconstruction (from severe to moderate stages). 34 test cases were assessed through alternating calibration and verification, with performance evaluated using Bland-Altman analysis, paired t-tests, and relative error calculations.

Results

For scan intervals under 3 years, forward prediction achieved a mean absolute error of 77 mm3 (7.0% relative to a mean target volume of 918 mm3) and backward reconstruction achieved 53 mm3 (8.4% relative to 542 mm3) within the inherent CT measurement uncertainty of 8-12%. For longer intervals (> 3 years), relative errors increased to 16.8-21.6%. Individual errors ranged from 0.02% to 36.8%, with no systematic bias detected.

Conclusion

The quantitative parametric RCT model demonstrates feasibility for patient-specific estimation of CAVD progression and shows promise for optimizing follow-up intervals. External validation in larger independent cohorts and incorporation of patient-specific risk factors are required before clinical implementation.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Aug 2026

From Valve Disease to Valve Replacement: Lipoprotein(a) Is Associated with Aortic Stenosis Severity but Not Prognosis After TAVI

Background: Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] has emerged as a key mediator of calcific aortic valve disease and is strongly linked to the development and progression of aortic stenosis (AS). Whether elevated Lp(a) influences disease severity, long-term prognosis, or both in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implanta...

N. Clodi, Nikolaos Schörghofer, Christoph Knapitsch et al. · 0 citations
Sep 2026

Mitral Regurgitation and Severe Aortic Stenosis: Clinical Characteristics, Prognostic Impact, and Response to TAVR: Insights From Egnite Data.

BACKGROUND Aortic stenosis (AS) and mitral regurgitation (MR) frequently co-occur, complicating diagnosis and treatment. We examined current US treatment trends and patient outcomes among patients with severe AS and at least moderate MR. METHODS We analyzed data from 2 992 362 patients (aged ≥18 years) undergoing 5 2...

Benjamin E. Peterson, Philippe Généreaux, Pinak B. Shah et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Redo TAVR With Asymmetric Coronary Risk

Image(s) Computed tomography (CT) and computational modeling (DASI) in redo transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) planning. Case Summary A 77-year-old woman presented with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis due to degeneration of a prior transcatheter valve. CT demonstrated leaflet calcification with borderline...

Connor McKechnie, N. J. Valle, Omar Saleh et al. · 0 citations
Sep 2026

Impact of Sievers morphology on fibro-calcific remodeling in severe bicuspid aortic valve stenosis: Exploratory findings from sex-stratified analyses.

AIMS Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most frequent valvular complication of bicuspid aortic valve (BAV), characterized by progressive fibro-calcific remodeling of the valve leaflets, but whether Sievers morphology (type 0 vs. type 1) influences tissue composition and whether these differences are sex-specific remain unclea...

Jun Shu, Jing-Ji Xu, Xiao-Li Meng et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Diagnostic performance of computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a single-centre feasibility study.

OBJECTIVE Coronary artery disease (CAD) is prevalent in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) may provide non-invasive functional assessment using existing TAVI planning imaging to evaluate CT-FFR...

Soner Aksüyek, F. Koca, Abdulsamet Arslan et al. · 0 citations
Open access Sep 2026

A Digital Twin to Predict Patient Response to Valve Replacement Following Aortic Stenosis

Lack of available data, ease of clinical use and lack of evidence for prognostic benefit are arguably the key limitations to clinical uptake for any model. This paper reports the development of an image-based analysis protocol, coupling 0D left heart and systemic circulation components with a 3D aortic valve model to m...

K. Czechowicz, Grace Faulkner, M. Kelm et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.