Skip to content

Run-time Quantitative Operational Monitoring for BDI Agents

Jul 2026 · ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology · 0 citations · 53 references

TL;DR

This paper proposes a run-time quantitative operational monitoring methodology based on Discrete-Time Markov Chains (DTMCs), integrating execution traces with probabilistic model checking, and advances agent verification from pre-deployment analysis to ongoing quantitative assurance under uncertainty.

Abstract

The BDI (Belief-Desire-Intention) agent paradigm has been used to model decision-making in autonomous systems that operate with little to no human intervention, reasoning with beliefs, desires, and intentions on-the-fly to achieve goals. Since BDI agents are used to make decisions in safety-critical systems, verifying that they make correct decisions is vital. Existing design-time verification techniques are effective before deployment, but they cannot capture how agent behaviour evolves during execution, especially under imprecise actuation and probabilistic decision-making. This paper bridges the gap between design-time and run-time verification of probabilistic BDI agents. We propose a run-time quantitative operational monitoring methodology based on Discrete-Time Markov Chains (DTMCs), integrating execution traces with probabilistic model checking. Our approach constructs a DTMC representation of possible agent behaviours at design time, then incrementally updates it using observed execution traces to provide situational insight into agent operation. To demonstrate our work, we contribute a probabilistic BDI language extension, explicate our approach through smart manufacturing for probabilistic BDI agents, and use a rover case study to show the generality of our DTMC-based monitoring. We further implement this monitoring mechanism and evaluate its efficiency and scalability experimentally. This advances agent verification from pre-deployment analysis to ongoing quantitative assurance under uncertainty.

View source

Similar papers

Conference Jul 2026

Formal Trajectory Analysis for Testing Agentic AI in Stateful Environments

We propose a formal model for testing AI agents in stateful environments, using Finite State Machine (FSM) semantics to enable deterministic, trace-level evaluation via an explicit test oracle. Our approach introduces a classified action alphabet and six computable failure-mode detectors for automatic analysis over age...

Ahmed Twabi, Yepeng Ding, Tohru Kondo · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Strategic Evaluation of Planning Strategies for LLM Agents in Cyber-Physical Systems

A controlled, physics-grounded benchmark built around planning-induced control trajectories: the ordered planning operations and directives through which an execution architecture acts on other agents and the physical process is introduced.

J. de Curtò, I. de Zarzà · 1 citation
Review Aug 2026

Argus: A General-Purpose Agentic Reasoning Runtime for Long-Horizon Tasks

Results show that a fixed-weight, self-evolving harness can revise, recover, and accumulate verified approaches while producing structured trajectories for future supervised and reinforcement learning.

Boxiu Li, Zi-Mo Wen, Yijia Fan et al. · 2 citations · ⚡1
Preprint Sep 2026

Regret Dominates Surprise: Design-Time Requirements Engineering for Agentic-AI Safety

Requirements engineers for agentic-AI domains face challenges in evaluating, specifying, and operationalizing safe autonomy. Mainstream frameworks, such as Goal-Oriented Requirements Engineering (GORE), lack mechanisms to systematically address these challenges under epistemic uncertainty. We contribute an approach tha...

Nuwayyir Almohammadi, Rami Bahsoon, Tao-An Chen · 0 citations

AgentInspect: Diagnosing Behavioral Failures in Artificial Intelligence Agents

This work developed AgentInspect, a framework that automatically detects six types of behavioral failures in LangChain-based AI agents by analyzing their execution trajectories across three evaluation settings: a baseline setting using real tool responses, a simulated setting incorporating synthetic tool responses, and...

Ruchira Manke, Mohammad Wardat, Hridesh Rajan et al. · 1 citation
Review Jul 2026

Beyond Component Testing: Validating Agentic AI Systems

This survey synthesizes 257 papers spanning agent evaluation, software assurance, cyber-physical systems, runtime monitoring, and regulatory guidance in order to characterize the validation problem for agentic systems, and concludes with a lifecycle-oriented research agenda centered on bounded-autonomy specifications,...

Fabio Orazio Mirto, L. D'Agati, Giuseppe Tricomi et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.