Skip to content
Review Open access

Dose reporting and dose-stratified effects of early mobilization in mechanically ventilated adult ICU patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Aug 2026 · Frontiers in Medicine · Vol 13 · 0 citations · 48 references
Medicine

TL;DR

Moderate- to high-dose mobilization appears to be associated with more favorable outcomes when tailored to clinical resources and patient tolerance, and future trials should standardize the definition and reporting of mobilization dose to support individualized and resource-optimized mobilization strategies.

Abstract

Background This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate how early mobilization dose is reported and to explore dose-stratified effects of early mobilization on functional recovery, clinical outcomes, diaphragmatic function, and safety in mechanically ventilated adult ICU patients. Methods Eight electronic databases were searched from inception to May 2026. Randomized controlled trials involving mechanically ventilated adult intensive care unit patients were included. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Early mobilization interventions were classified as low-, moderate-, or high-dose according to frequency, duration, and intensity. Results Thirty-one randomized controlled trials involving 3,498 participants were included. Overall, early mobilization improved functional and selected clinical outcomes, without significantly affecting mortality [RR = 1.13, 95% CI (0.89, 1.42), P = 0.258]. In dose-stratified analyses, the moderate-dose subgroup showed the most favorable effects on ICU-acquired weakness [RR = 0.19, 95% CI (0.09, 0.41)] and ICU length of stay [MD = −4.14, 95% CI (−5.00, −3.27), P < 0.001]. For adverse events, significant reductions were observed in the moderate-dose [RR = 0.41, 95% CI (0.25, 0.67), P < 0.001] and low-dose subgroups [RR = 0.25, 95% CI (0.11, 0.57), P = 0.001], but not in the high-dose subgroup [RR = 0.85, 95% CI (0.21, 3.54), P = 0.822]. Conclusions Incomplete and inconsistent reporting of mobilization dose may partly explain the variability in meta-analytic findings across early mobilization trials. Moderate- to high-dose mobilization appears to be associated with more favorable outcomes when tailored to clinical resources and patient tolerance. Given the substantial heterogeneity across studies, future trials should standardize the definition and reporting of mobilization dose to support individualized and resource-optimized mobilization strategies. Systematic Review Registration PROSPERO, CRD420261416276.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Sep 2026

Efficacy and safety of early mobilization in patients with ARDS: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective To evaluate the effect of early mobilization in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Methods Computerized searches were conducted in PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang Data, CBM, and VIP databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on early mobilizati...

Ze-Yan Wu, Xiao-Yue Wei, Yan Sun et al. · 0 citations
Meta-analysis Open access Sep 2026

Impact of early goal-directed mobilization on ICU-acquired weakness: a meta-analysis

Background ICU-acquired weakness (ICU-AW) significantly impairs muscle strength and physical function in critically ill patients. Early mobilization interventions have been increasingly adopted, yet the specific effects of a structured EGDM program on ICU-AW and functional outcomes have not been systematically quantifi...

Jia-Yi Zhou, Li-Fei Dai, Xiao-Li Liu et al. · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

Impact of Evidence-Based Feeding Protocols on Clinical Outcomes and Nutritional Delivery in Critically Ill Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS Evidence-based feeding protocols are used to standardize nutritional care in critically ill adults, but their effects on clinical outcomes remain uncertain. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of these protocols on clinical outcomes, and to quantify their effects...

Sadaharu Asami, Akira Ouchi, N. Higashibeppu et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Oct 2026

“Effects of different sedative agents in mechanically ventilated patients with sepsis: a GRADE-assessed systematic review and network meta-analysis”

The optimal sedative agent for mechanically ventilated adults with sepsis or septic shock remains uncertain. We evaluated the comparative effectiveness and safety of commonly used sedatives using network meta-analysis and GRADE. PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched...

Ume Aiman, Umer Bin Shahzad, Muhammad Aqib Farooq Khan et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Multicomponent non-pharmacological interventions for preventing delirium in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

This study demonstrated that multi-component interventions effectively reduce delirium incidence in critically ill patients, and the evidence did not establish that one component combination was superior to another.

Shi-Ting Wang, Jia-Ming Lei, Wen-Jing Huang et al. · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

Long-Term Mortality and Functional Outcomes After Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Critically Ill Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVES To evaluate long-term all-cause mortality and functional outcomes among critically ill adults treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), including differences by ECMO modality and clinical indication. DATA SOURCES Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Emcare, Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scopus...

Kaylee T. Stebbins, Chun Yee Yap, Lois Segun-Beloved et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.