Skip to content
Open access

SP 11.15 Body-Mass-Index (BMI) is Not Predictive of Post-Operative Complications After Robotic Colorectal Resection: A Single-Centre Five-Year Experience

Aug 2026 · British Journal of Surgery · Vol 113 · 0 citations

TL;DR

BMI is not associated with complications, suggesting that RAS is a more favourable approach than laparoscopic for colorectal resections in patients with a high BMI.

Abstract

Robotic Assisted (RAS) colorectal resections have shown positive outcomes when compared to laparoscopic approaches. For laparoscopic resections, BMI is a significant predictor of the development of post-operative complications. We aimed to report RAS outcomes for colorectal resections, and to assess whether BMI was associated with post-operative complications. All adult patients undergoing RAS colorectal resections between July 2021-2025 were included from our prospectively updated database. Reversal of stoma operations were excluded. Multivariate regression (MVR) was conducted to assess factors predicting complications. Subgroup chi-squared analysis was used to assess whether each BMI category differed in terms of complications. Over five years, 270 patients were included. Most were men (54.8), median age was 64. Conversion to open rates, mortality and post-operative complication rates were all low (0.7%, 2.9% and 30% respectively). Severe complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥3) were only present in 3%. The only significant predictor of complications on MVR was CRP on post-operative day 3 (p=0.002). Most patients were overweight (40%) or obese (34.1%). Normal BMIs were present in 21.4% of patients, 1.9% were underweight and 2.4% morbidly obese. BMI was not predictive of post-operative complications in any category: underweight (BMI ≤18.5, p=0.158), normal (BMI 18.6-24.5, p=0.096), overweight (BMI 25-29.9, p=0.999), obese (BMI 30-39.9, p=0.561) and morbidly obese (BMI ≥40, p=0.366). RAS resections have low conversion to open and mortality rates. Severe complications are rare. BMI is not associated with complications, suggesting that RAS is a more favourable approach than laparoscopic for colorectal resections in patients with a high BMI.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Review Open access Aug 2026

SP 3.01 Abdominal Fat Ratio as a Predictor of Conversion and Post-Operative Outcomes in Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Colorectal Cancer Surgery

Abdominal fat ratio (AFR) is a validated CT-derived measure of visceral fat distribution and an independent predictor of conversion in obese patients (BMI≥30) undergoing laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery, with a cut-off of >4 predicting conversion with ∼75% accuracy. Robotic colorectal surgery is associated with...

Bing Wang, Zuzanna Iwanczyk, Jamil Ahmed et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

TPT 1.07 A Comparative Statistical Analysis of Postoperative Complications and Clavien–Dindo Severity in Robotic versus Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery

Robotic surgery did not demonstrate reduced postoperative-morbidity or CD-severity compared with laparoscopy compared with laparoscopy, and complication severity appeared primarily driven by patient factors and case complexity.

Mohammed Arifuzaman · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

TPW 1.13 Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Colectomy: A Propensity-Matched Comparative Study from a UK Colorectal Unit

Robotic surgery is increasingly used for colorectal resections, yet its role outside complex pelvic dissection remains uncertain. This study compared peri-operative outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic colectomies (excluding right hemicolectomy) performed at a UK tertiary centre. A retrospective-review was...

Mohammed Arifuzaman, Madan Jha, V. Garud · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.