Skip to content

Learning Structural Convergence: A Neuro-Symbolic Benchmark for Temporal Reasoning

Michael Romei De Socio G. Pozzato Alessio Merlo
Jul 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2607.22365 · 0 citations · 35 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

In controlled synthetic settings, semantically grounded trajectories provide an effective representation for temporal structural reasoning, supporting further investigation of semantic interfaces between event data, structured representations, and temporal learning.

Abstract

High-complexity operational environments require methods that detect and anticipate temporally distributed patterns rather than classify isolated events. This paper introduces TRACTA (Temporal Reasoning and Capability-Trajectory Analysis), a controlled synthetic benchmark for temporal structural reasoning in high-complexity event-driven systems, instantiated through Multi-Domain Operations (MDO)-like scenarios. The benchmark includes three tasks: early_warning, pattern_detection, and run_classification, and compares raw-event neural models, a contract-lite semantic baseline, and a neuro-symbolic configuration operating on semantically grounded trajectories. Results show that raw event-level learning remains informative, but learned temporal modeling over semantic capability and contextual direct-impact trajectories achieves the highest aggregate point estimates, with the largest margins on the temporal tasks. Ablation analysis indicates that capability dynamics, contextual impacts, and temporal structure contribute complementary information. Shortcut diagnostics indicate that the most direct cross-run global-identifier shortcut is controlled in the primary neural input view, while residual shallow signals remain. Overall, the findings support a bounded methodological conclusion: in controlled synthetic settings, semantically grounded trajectories provide an effective representation for temporal structural reasoning, supporting further investigation of semantic interfaces between event data, structured representations, and temporal learning.

View source

Similar papers

Open access Jul 2026

Symbolic-driven agentic reasoning for environmental and behavioral event detection

SDAR employs a symbolic reasoning engine to guide agentic decision making, connecting low-level visual cues with structured symbolic representations of events, and enables interpretable reasoning chains that capture causal relationships, contextual dependencies, and event categories.

Guangyao Chen, Liqin Luo, Jun Peng et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

From Ambiguity to Execution: An Agentic Neuro-Symbolic Framework for Transforming Building Regulations into Deterministic Constraints

This research proposes an Agentic Neuro-Symbolic Framework that decouples semantic interpretation from geometric verification and establishes a scalable foundation for autonomous compliance, demonstrating that AI reliability in engineering significantly improves when probabilistic models orchestrate deterministic tools rather than predicting physical realities.

N. Mirhosseini, D. Shojaei, Soheil Sabri · 0 citations
Jul 2026

Constraint-Anchored Reasoning Traces

Constraint-Anchored Reasoning Traces (CART) is proposed, a neuro-symbolic framework that trains MLLMs to interleave natural language reasoning steps with symbolic constraint assertions: lightweight, machine-checkable statements about visual content.

Zehua Cheng, Wei Dai, Jiahao Sun · 0 citations
Preprint Sep 2026

Towards Neuro-Symbolic Procedural Reasoning for Long-Horizon Vision-Language-Action Manipulation

Vision-language-action (VLA) models can execute short manipulation skills, but remain brittle in long-horizon procedures requiring persistent task state, dependency-aware reasoning, conditional decisions, and reliable grounding. We investigate a neuro-symbolic framework that combines learned VLA control with explicit task graphs and multimodal procedural memory. Task graphs encode action dependencies, valid transitions, and branch conditions, while memory maintains the active step, completed actions, textual context, and task-relevant visual evidence. Together, these structures guide object selection, destination grounding, subgoal dispatch, and verification of expected state transitions. Human demonstrations provide additional spatial and temporal guidance through gaze or saliency cues. To isolate their effect on policy learning, our initial study bypasses cross-view gaze transfer and directly annotates pseudo-gaze in robot-view teleoperation videos. The resulting guidance is used during VLA fine-tuning and inference. We study two long-horizon manipulation domains, workspace clearing and surgical-instrument handling, which require ordered execution, visually grounded decisions, and conditional branching. We evaluate correct-object and destination selection, subtask completion, task progress, step-order consistency, complete-task success, and procedural or execution mistakes. This work positions structured symbolic reasoning and demonstration-derived visual guidance as complementary mechanisms for reliable long-horizon VLA manipulation.

Unknown authors · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.