Stone size is an independent predictor of surgical success and may serve as a practical preoperative criterion for patient selection when considering a fluoroscopy-free approach.
Abstract
Fluoroscopy is routinely used during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) but exposes both patients and operating room staff to ionizing radiation. Fluoroscopy-free RIRS has emerged as an alternative strategy; however, the influence of stone size on surgical success remains insufficiently defined.
This retrospective study included 224 patients who underwent fluoroscopy-free RIRS between January 2021 and January 2023. Patients were stratified according to stone size as < 15 mm (Group 1,
n
= 65) and ≥ 15 mm (Group 2,
n
= 159). Demographic and stone-related variables were compared between groups. Surgical success was defined as complete stone clearance or clinically insignificant residual fragments < 3 mm on postoperative computed tomography. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of surgical success.
The median age was comparable between the two groups (
p
= 0.770). No significant differences were observed regarding sex, stone location, or stone density. Median stone size was 8 mm (range, 4–14 mm) in Group 1 and 18 mm (range, 15–27 mm) in Group 2 (
p
< 0.001). Overall surgical success was 72.3%, with a significantly higher success rate in Group 1 than in Group 2 (96.9% vs. 62.2%, p < 0.001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis demonstrated that stone size ≥ 15 mm was independently associated with a lower likelihood of surgical success (OR 0.039, 95% CI 0.009–0.167, p < 0.001), while higher stone density was also independently associated with reduced surgical success (OR 0.999, 95% CI 0.998–1.000,
p
= 0.021). Among the 62 patients with surgical failure, 13 (21.0%) underwent repeat RIRS, 25 (40.3%) received extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy, and 24 (38.7%) were lost to follow-up.
Fluoroscopy-free RIRS is an effective treatment option for selected patients, particularly those with stones < 15 mm. Stone size is an independent predictor of surgical success and may serve as a practical preoperative criterion for patient selection when considering a fluoroscopy-free approach.
RIRS demonstrates comparable efficacy and safety for single and multiple renal stones, supporting its use on a viable treatment option in patients with stone multiplicity, and larger adequately powered studies are warranted to determine whether smaller between-group differences exist.
Ahmed M. Abdel Gawad, T. Abouelgreed, M. Rehan et al.· Archivio Italiano di Urologi...· 0 citations
Background: Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) and Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS) are widely used treatment modalities for renal stones measuring 10–20 mm. While mini-PCNL is associated with high stone clearance rates, RIRS offers a less invasive approach with faster postoperative recover...
D. R. Manik, Ramlan Nasution, G. Siregar· International Journal of Res...· 0 citations
Background Digital flexible ureteroscopy (FURS) has become a standard minimally invasive approach for treating renal calculi, yet evidence from Vietnam remains limited. This study evaluated treatment outcomes and identified predictors of stone-free rate (SFR) following digital FURS. Methods A prospective observational...
Tuấn Minh Nguyễn, T. Nguyen, Ho-Ang Long et al.· Surgery in Practice and Scie...· 0 citations
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of simultaneous endourological management of ureteral and ipsilateral renal stones and to identify predictive factors associated with stone-free outcomes.Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on seventy-nine patients who underwent s...
I. Hamid-zada, Ozgur Arıkan, M. T. Nuroğlu et al.· Endouroloji Bulteni· 0 citations
INTRODUCTION
Endoscopic laser lithotripsy is becoming the mainstay for pediatric urolithiasis management, and the location of stones strongly influences the stone-free outcome. This study reports location-specific stone-free rates and evaluates factors associated with the clearance of lower-pole stones.
METHODS
We co...
H. Ebrahimi, Samer Maher, J. D. dos Santos et al.· Canadian Urological Associat...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.