Skip to content
Open access

BEYOND EFFECTIVENESS: INVESTIGATING STUDENT SATISFACTION WITH CHATBOT AI IN EFL ACADEMIC WRITING

Aug 2026 · LEARNING Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran · 0 citations

Abstract

The integration of artificial intelligence into higher education has made chatbot AI such as ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity common tools used by students in academic writing, yet research on student satisfaction toward their use in the Indonesian EFL context remains limited, as most previous studies emphasized effectiveness rather than affective and pedagogical factors. Therefore, this study focused on the satisfaction of English Language Education students at Ganesha University of Education (Undiksha) toward the use of chatbot AI as an assistive tool in academic writing, and on how specific aspects of chatbot based writing support, namely grammar assistance, idea development, feedback quality, and ease of use, influenced that satisfaction. This study employed a basic qualitative approach involving 10 students from the English Language Education Study Program at Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha (Undiksha). Participants were selected using purposive sampling with criterion-based selection based on their experience in using chatbot AI for academic writing. Data were collected through semi structured, in depth interviews with ten students selected using criterion-based selection. The interview recordings were transcribed verbatim and then analyzed using thematic analysis, resulting in three main themes, namely positive but conditional satisfaction, chatbot based writing support as the main source of satisfaction, and critical user control as the boundary of satisfaction. The findings showed that students were generally satisfied because chatbot AI helped them generate ideas, organize writing, correct grammar, obtain feedback, revise sentences, and find references quickly and practically. However, this satisfaction was conditional because students still needed to verify, revise, and control AI output that could be inaccurate or too general. This study concludes that chatbot AI facilitates academic writing and increases student satisfaction when it is used critically and responsibly as a supporting tool, rather than as a replacement for students’ own thinking and writing ability. ABSTRAK Integrasi kecerdasan buatan dalam pendidikan tinggi telah menjadikan chatbot AI seperti ChatGPT, Gemini, dan Perplexity sebagai alat bantu yang umum digunakan mahasiswa dalam penulisan akademik. Namun penelitian mengenai kepuasan mahasiswa terhadap penggunaannya dalam konteks EFL di Indonesia masih terbatas karena sebagian besar kajian sebelumnya lebih menekankan efektivitas daripada faktor afektif dan pedagogis. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini berfokus pada kepuasan mahasiswa Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris di Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha (Undiksha) terhadap penggunaan chatbot AI sebagai alat bantu dalam penulisan akademik, serta bagaimana aspek spesifik dari dukungan penulisan berbasis chatbot, yaitu bantuan tata bahasa, pengembangan ide, kualitas umpan balik, dan kemudahan penggunaan, memengaruhi kepuasan tersebut. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dasar dengan melibatkan 10 mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha (Undiksha). Partisipan dipilih menggunakan teknik purposive sampling dengan criterion-based selection berdasarkan pengalaman mereka dalam menggunakan chatbot AI untuk penulisan akademik. Data dikumpulkan melalui wawancara semi terstruktur dan mendalam terhadap sepuluh mahasiswa yang dipilih menggunakan purposive sampling berbasis kriteria. Rekaman wawancara ditranskripsi secara verbatim, kemudian dianalisis menggunakan analisis tematik hingga menghasilkan tiga tema utama, yaitu kepuasan positif namun bersyarat, dukungan penulisan berbasis chatbot sebagai sumber utama kepuasan, dan kontrol kritis pengguna sebagai batas kepuasan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa mahasiswa secara umum merasa puas karena chatbot AI membantu mereka menghasilkan ide, menyusun tulisan, memperbaiki tata bahasa, memperoleh umpan balik, merevisi kalimat, dan mencari referensi secara cepat dan praktis. Namun, kepuasan tersebut bersifat bersyarat karena mahasiswa tetap perlu memverifikasi, merevisi, dan mengontrol keluaran AI yang dapat tidak akurat atau terlalu umum. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa chatbot AI memfasilitasi penulisan akademik dan meningkatkan kepuasan mahasiswa ketika digunakan secara kritis dan bertanggung jawab sebagai alat pendukung, bukan sebagai pengganti pemikiran dan kemampuan menulis mahasiswa.

Read PDF

Similar papers

Open access Jul 2026

Measuring EFL Students' Motivation in Academic Writing Through the Use of ChatGPT

The findings suggest that the use of ChatGPT may be associated with changes in students’ motivation toward academic writing and highlight the importance of promoting balanced and responsible use of AI tools in educational contexts.

Astriana Talango, Nonny Basalama, D. Dama · 0 citations
Review Open access 2026

The Use of ChatGPT in Academic Writing: Perspectives from Undergraduate Students in Malaysian Public University

Findings carry pertinent pedagogical implications, suggesting that higher education practitioners should systematically integrate AI scaffolding into writing instruction to enhance self-regulated learning and writing behaviors.

Amirah Athirah Amir Yazid, N. Hasni, M. S. Y. Shak et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

EFL Students’ Reliance on ChatGPT as Writing Support: A Study on Thesis Writing at Hamzanwadi University

The research investigates the use of ChatGPT by EFL learners for their thesis writing in Hamzanwadi University. A sequential explanatory mixed-methods design was utilized whereby quantitative data were collected through questionnaires from 55 participants who are in the eighth semester while qualitative data were obtained from semi-structured interviews conducted with five purposive respondents. The study results showed a high level of functional reliance on ChatGPT with respect to the ability to understand certain complex theories, improve the grammar, and write paragraphs among students. Yet, psychological and cognitive dependence of students were at moderate levels. Hence, students are able to retain their critical thinking abilities and independence in academic pursuits and consider AI as their cooperating language helper rather than cognitive worker's replacement. Such a phenomenon that may be called "Controlled Reliance" proves that expansion of AI technologies application is not a reason for the lack of independent thinking. Therefore, the higher education institutions are encouraged to devise AI literacy courses aimed at enhancing the usage of artificial intelligence rather than prohibitive measures.

M. Rizki, Siti Maysuroh, Laila Wati et al. · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

The Dilemma of Using ChatGPT in Academic Writing: Balancing Efficiency and Students’ Historical Thinking Skills

The research findings indicate that ChatGPT enhances the efficiency of academic writing by accelerating information retrieval, idea development, outline creation, and time management, while still requiring students to engage in verification, paraphrasing, and the use of scholarly sources.

Ismaul Fitroh, Moh. Imron Rosidi, Renol Hasan · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

Students’ Perspectives on the Role of AI Chatbots in Enhancing Vocabulary and Grammar in EFL Writing

This qualitative study investigates students’ perspectives on the role of AI chatbots, particularly ChatGPT, in supporting vocabulary development and grammatical accuracy in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) writing. Data were collected from ten Management Study Program students at Universitas Widya Gama Mahakam Samarinda through interviews, classroom observations, and documentation, and were analyzed using an interactive qualitative model involving data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. The findings indicate that students use AI chatbots to obtain immediate grammar feedback, explore vocabulary alternatives, rephrase sentences, and request explanations. Students generally perceived AI as accessible and non-judgmental, which supported confidence and independent writing practice. However, the findings also reveal risks of over-reliance and instances of feedback that was contextually or academically inappropriate. Therefore, the educational value of AI chatbots depends on students’ critical evaluation of AI-generated suggestions rather than passive acceptance. Because the study involved a small, context-specific sample and did not measure longitudinal language gains, the findings should be interpreted as evidence of students’ perceptions and learning practices rather than proof of long-term proficiency improvement.

Unknown authors · 0 citations
Review Open access 2026

An Investigation of Students’ Perception of the Writing Process Using ChatGPT

Investigating learners’ perceptions of ChatGPT use, their perceptions of the planning, translating, and reviewing stages of writing, and the relationship between ChatGPT and these stages suggest that ChatGPT functions as a complementary tool that supports learners throughout the writing process while preserving the importance of cognitive and strategic writing behaviours.

Izlin Mohamad Ghazali, Hidayu Shafie, Nurul Nadiah Dewi Faizul Ganapathy et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.