Jun 2026· Multiverse Journal· Vol 3, pp. 93-114· 0 citations· 4 references
Abstract
Multinational organizations operating across diverse regulatory regimes face significant challenges in managing compliance obligations that span multiple jurisdictions, industries, and legal frameworks. The fragmented nature of compliance management, characterized by siloed risk assessments, disconnected control mechanisms, and duplicative reporting structures, creates operational inefficiencies, heightened compliance risks, and increased costs. This paper examines the conceptual foundations and practical implementation of cross-industry unified compliance frameworks designed to address these challenges. Building upon Chinenye's (2013) foundational work on transitioning from fragmented compliance to integrated governance, this study explores how multinational organizations can harmonize regulatory controls, security protocols, and risk management processes across disparate operational contexts. Through analysis of international standards (ISO 19600, ISO 31000, COSO ERM), technological enablers (blockchain, automation, GRC platforms), and governance architectures, the paper proposes a comprehensive framework for achieving compliance integration. The framework emphasizes centralized policy development coupled with localized implementation, continuous monitoring mechanisms, and stakeholder engagement across organizational boundaries. Findings indicate that successful unified compliance frameworks require alignment of organizational culture, technology infrastructure, and governance structures while maintaining flexibility to accommodate jurisdiction-specific requirements. The paper concludes with recommendations for practitioners and identifies areas for future research in compliance harmonization and regulatory technology.
This review synthesizes cross-sector evidence to identify structural, operational, and technological barriers to harmonization, while proposing an integrative governance perspective grounded in recent empirical and policy literature.
William Asare Yirenkyi, G. Apaflo, Matilda Konotey et al.· Magna Scientia Advanced Rese...· 0 citations
Global value chains (GVCs) generate efficiency through production fragmentation but simultaneously create sustainability vulnerabilities that can undermine GVC resilience. While MNE buyer-led private ordering and state regulation represent the primary governance responses to these risks, their effects on supplier com...
Shubham Singh, Ajai Gaur, R. Mudambi· Journal of International Bus...· 0 citations
Portugal is expanding its portfolio of recognized critical infrastructures from approximately 150 to more than 400 entities across twelve strategic sectors, reflecting increasing cross-sector interdependence and exposure to hybrid disruptions. Critical infrastructure governance is coordinated by the National Security O...
P. A. P. Costa, António Gonçalves, M. Marques· 2026 6th International Confe...· 0 citations
In an era marked by intensifying regulatory scrutiny and stakeholder activism, corporate compliance is no
longer a peripheral legal obligation but a core strategic function. This study examines how organizations can
transform compliance from a cost center into a value-creating mechanism that enhances corporate accounta...
Partha Priya Das, Moni Deepa Das, Utpal Chakraborty et al.· International Journal of Dru...· 0 citations
This paper identifies a threefold paradigm mismatch between decentralized finance and traditional financial regulation, giving rise to multiple regulatory challenges such as difficulties in holding entities accountable, ambiguity in defining regulatory targets, ineffective regulatory rules, and obstacles to cross-borde...
Ying-Zhu Chen· Advances in Economics, Manag...· 0 citations