This work intervenes on one factor at a time inside a fixed pipeline, holding candidate scoring and voting constant while they vary the search dimension, the subspace that carries the perturbation, and its norm.
Abstract
Adapting a language model to a task no longer requires training all of its weights, and a line of parameter-efficient methods has driven the trainable count from billions down to a handful of scalars. Gradient-free adaptation, which samples random weight perturbations and keeps the ones that score well, has not followed that trajectory and still perturbs every entry of the weight tensor. It is unknown whether that full-weight search is necessary, and more fundamentally which property of a perturbation makes it work at all, because existing methods vary the search space, the perturbation scale, and the aggregation together. We resolve this by intervening on one factor at a time inside a fixed pipeline, holding candidate scoring and voting constant while we vary the search dimension, the subspace that carries the perturbation, and its norm. Perturbing a frozen frame of 12 to 16 scalars stays 1.8 accuracy points behind full-weight search on average across 49 model-benchmark cells, trailing it in 36 of them. Neither the dimension nor the choice of basis explains that performance. A random frame whose Grassmann overlap with the SVD frame is at chance level performs identically once a single scale factor is matched, and at large scales the SVD directions collapse first. What survives is the perturbation norm, whose usable range closes within a factor of five across seven models and stays flat inside. The perturbation norm is therefore the one factor with a failure mode, and its safe region transfers across scale and family. The design question narrows from which subspace to perturb to how hard to shake.
Gradient descent on a factored model $W = UV^\top$ is implicitly biased toward low-rank solutions, while Adam, starting from the same small initialization, is not. We trace the difference to the gauge symmetry of the loss, its invariance under $(U, V) \mapsto (UQ, VQ)$. Gradient flow's low-rank mechanism is available to an optimizer only if that optimizer is gauge-equivariant, a condition necessary for the transfer but not sufficient for low-rank recovery. Gradient descent, momentum,"shared-scalar"Adam, Muon, and Shampoo satisfy it. Adam, RMSProp, and the other coordinate-wise methods do not. A structure theorem characterizes the memoryless equivariant rules as exactly the Gram-determined left preconditioners, and a transfer theorem carries gradient flow's pathwise properties to common-scalar flows. We then sort nine update rules on underdetermined matrix sensing by recovery error against the planted ground truth. A one-parameter family from coordinate-wise to shared-scalar preconditioning restores the bias monotonically, isolating anisotropy as the cause. A"spectral schedule"reconciles two opposing reports about Muon: equal-rate updates recover exactly low-rank targets but lose their edge as the spectral tail grows. In transformers, Adam separates two gauge-equivalent initializations at the first step, where the equivariant optimizers stay at float precision, and ends with the per-head invariants $W_Q^\top W_K$ 56% apart in relative Frobenius distance, a gap no per-head rotation can close. On two hyperspectral datasets at matched training loss, gradient descent cuts held-out error by 43-44% at the lowest sampling density, and at lower effective rank. Basis choice is therefore not a tuning detail but a decision about which interpolant the optimizer selects.
It is shown that a principled design space for LoRA initialization and curvature preconditioning should be treated as a tunable dimension rather than a fixed design decision, and a deployable, search-free variant, ULoRA-Auto, selects per-layer exponents from measured spectral statistics, approaches this upper bound at no additional search cost, and ranks at or near the top among deployable LoRA methods.
Muon and related matrix-sign optimizers are increasingly used to pre-train large language models, but their effect on the internal geometry of individual weight matrices is not well understood. This preliminary report proposes a unified framework built on a single idealizing assumption -- exact scale invariance of the loss under weight rescaling, which holds approximately in normalization-heavy networks. Under this assumption, plain SGD carries a built-in 1/||W|| brake on its update size, whereas Muon's matrix-sign step removes that brake, so both the Frobenius and spectral norms drift outward faster (t^{1/2} versus t^{1/4}). We further observe that the spectral-norm perturbation has a non-negative second-order term. This implies that a lightweight"spectral cap"-- which projects out only the first-order growth of the single top singular direction from each update -- can control the output covariance W K_X W^T without freezing training: the weight keeps learning through non-top directions, top-direction rotation, and top switching. We relate this cap to the min-entropy (H-infinity) of the singular-value spectrum. We then study three systems trained with Muon: a nanoGPT feed-forward projection, a 64-expert mixture-of-experts router, and the query/key projections of a bf16 FlashAttention block. In each case the cap increases isotropy and, at the margins -- a router collapsing to a single expert, and the near-divergence of one attention head -- prevents a concrete failure, while leaving validation loss essentially unchanged. We emphasize that the scale-invariance assumption is strong and that these small-scale results are preliminary; comments are welcome.
B\"urger et al.\ (2024) demonstrated that truth representations in large language models are universal across statement polarity but reside within a multidimensional subspace. The truth value of a statement is linearly readable from a residual stream of language model, but it is not clear how much of that representation fits on a single direction, which component builds it, or what it is made of. We conducted a study based on these questions, with one instrument: a training-free axis, the dominant direction of the singular value decomposition (SVD) of hidden-state differences over true/false minimal pairs, identified without labels up to one global sign. Extensive evaluation across 14 models from 6 diverse architectural families (including MoE), read and extract at cost $O(d)$ per token. We close with a pre-registered prediction on whether the arrangement extends to categories whose truth is computed rather than retrieved.
This survey traces attention from Bahdanau-Luong alignment through the Transformer and into vision architectures, and reviews fixed and learned sparse attention, linear attention, IO-aware exact algorithms including FlashAttention, and state-space alternatives including Mamba.
An angular effective learning rate is derived that accounts for the parameter-update angle, parameter norm, and update norm, and shows that the conventional norm-based measure is a special case under parameter-update orthogonality.
