Evidence for the Efficacy and Safety of Tigecycline for the Treatment of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review

Abstract

Background: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a common and serious nosocomial infection in mechanically ventilated preterm infants and is increasingly caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Gram-negative organisms. Tigecycline, a glycylcycline with broad activity against many such pathogens, is not approved below 18 years of age and carries a boxed warning for excess mortality that is most pronounced in hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia. Its role, if any, in preterm infants with VAP is undefined. Objectives: To systematically identify and appraise all human evidence on the efficacy (clinical cure, microbiological eradication, survival) and safety (adverse events, mortality) of tigecycline used to treat VAP or nosocomial pneumonia during mechanical ventilation in preterm infants and neonates. Methods: A PRISMA 2020 structured search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, Scopus, trial registries, regulatory documents, Google Scholar and reference lists was designed without language or date restrictions. Eligible reports described tigecycline treatment of pneumonia/VAP in neonates or young infants; pediatric case series and syntheses were retained as contextual evidence. Because only case reports and small non-comparative series were anticipated, a narrative synthesis was pre-specified; JBI tools and GRADE were planned for appraisal and certainty. Results: No randomized controlled trial, controlled observational study, or study dedicated to tigecycline for VAP in preterm infants was identified. Direct evidence meeting the full eligibility criteria (preterm neonate, VAP specifically, separately extractable outcomes) was limited to two case reports of extremely preterm neonates with VAP successfully weaned after tigecycline-based salvage combination therapy. Six further neonatal/young-infant reports initially considered were, on full-text re-review, reclassified as contextual (not index) evidence because they described non-VAP infections (sepsis, or CNS infections such as ventriculitis/meningitis), non-preterm ages, or mixed-infection series without separable VAP data. Reported outcomes were generally favorable in published cases but are subject to severe selection and publication bias; thrombocytopenia, hypofibrinogenemia and hepatic enzyme elevation were the principal adverse signals, against a class-level mortality signal concentrated in VAP. Quantitative pooling was not appropriate. The overall certainty of evidence was very low. Conclusions: There is no direct, credible efficacy or safety evidence supporting tigecycline for VAP in preterm infants. Available data neither establish benefit nor exclude harm. Based on this very-low-certainty evidence and on regulatory/class-level safety data rather than on demonstrated efficacy, tigecycline warrants consideration only as a last-resort, combination salvage option for culture-confirmed pan- or extensively drug-resistant pathogens when no safer alternative exists, with intensive monitoring and, ideally, within a registry or trial. Adequately designed neonatal pharmacokinetic and comparative safety studies are urgently needed. Registration: PROSPERO CRD420261450972 (registered 14 July 2026).