Skip to content

What Softmax Throws Away: Mass-Aware Attention for Evidence Accumulation

Jul 2026 · arXiv.org · Vol abs/2607.22781 · 0 citations · 37 references
Computer Science

TL;DR

Mass-Aware Attention is proposed, which generalizes standard L1 normalization to an Lp family and is positioned as a general normalization principle for improving predictor-facing representation informativeness by controlling repetition invariance in standard attention.

Abstract

High task performance does not show whether a model retains prediction-relevant structural information in its internal representation. Temporal graph models, for example, can achieve high future-link AUC while basic graph statistics remain difficult to recover from the same representation. We identify one source of this gap in the weighted averaging used by standard attention: when an evidence pattern is repeated, the numerator and denominator grow at the same rate, so inputs with different amounts of accumulated evidence can produce the same aggregate. We propose Mass-Aware Attention (MAA), which generalizes standard L1 normalization to an Lp family. Under repetition, MAA makes the numerator and denominator scale at different rates, retaining the effective number of contributing inputs in the representation magnitude. It adds no supervision, parameters, hidden dimensions, or explicit count features, and recovers standard attention at p=1. Across four continuous-time dynamic graph models and three datasets, MAA improves future-link AUC in 11 of 12 model-dataset cells. Linear recovery from the same hidden representation increases by 4.49% on average, and preferential-attachment recovery improves in all 12 cells after family-wise correction. We also observe consistent evidence in marked temporal point processes, temporal knowledge graphs, retrieval-augmented generation, and spatio-temporal point processes. Information accessibility and task utility remain distinct: NLL improves in MTPP, ranking is largely preserved in TKG, additional information in RAG does not improve the diagnostic head, and downstream LayerNorm can erase the signal in STPP. These results position MAA as a general normalization principle for improving predictor-facing representation informativeness by controlling repetition invariance in standard attention.

View source

Similar papers

Preprint Aug 2026

Attention-Path Fragility as an Uncertainty Signal in Large Language Models

It is proposed that a model's uncertainty about a token is reflected not only in the breadth of its output distribution but also in whether a confident prediction is \emph{fragile} under perturbation of its attention pathways, a training-free estimator that masks attention heads and measures the BALD mutual information among the resulting subnetworks.

Minsoo Kim, Sungyoung Ji, Kisung Moon et al. · 0 citations
Jul 2026

Through the Bottleneck: How Multi-head Latent Attention Separates Content from Position in Language Models

This work presents the first comprehensive mechanistic interpretability study of MLA, training a 114M-parameter transformer and analyzing its representations through SVD, attention head taxonomy, linear probing, and a disruption-attribution analysis.

S. Dhruvil, Fenil Sojitra, R. Chauhan · 0 citations
#machine learning Preprint Sep 2026

High-Dimensional Learning Dynamics of Attention-Indexed Models

Attention mechanisms are central to modern foundation models, yet their training dynamics remain poorly understood, especially when the attention matrices have extensive rank. In this work, we study attention-indexed models, a broad framework that can represent multi-layer and multi-head attention architectures. First, we show that, in a suitable high-dimensional limit, the population-loss landscape is characterized by a finite set of trace order parameters. In contrast, online stochastic gradient descent (SGD) is governed by an infinite hierarchy of matrix moments, which we show can be exponentially well-approximated by a finite truncated system. Second, this framework reveals that attention parameterization itself can act as an architectural implicit bias. Direct optimization of an attention matrix $S\in\mathbb{R}^{d\times d}$ can remain trapped in an uninformative state. Tied attention ($S=WW^\top$) induces an automatic symmetry-breaking mechanism and yields weak recovery in $\Theta(d^2\log d)$ samples. For untied attention, $S=UV^\top$, we uncover a fast-slow mechanism: the pre-activation mean first evolves on a fast timescale, while the overlaps evolve on a slower one. Weak recovery on the $\Theta(d^2\log d)$ scale occurs when the state selected by the fast dynamics breaks the initial symmetry.

Yizhou Xu, M. Sagitova, Lenka Zdeborová et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

No Universal Signal Predicts Sample-Level LLM Regression under Version Updates

It is found that signal effectiveness is task-dependent: confidence is strongest on MCQ and simpler math, while likelihood/KL signals give the most frequent gains on harder math and code; no signal is universally best across model updates either, and some cross-version signals stay informative even when confidence fails, including without labels.

Jiang-li Sheng, Yiwei Lu · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Attention is Case-Sensitive

This paper presents a systematic empirical characterization study revealing that Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit an analogous property: letter casing modulates internal attention allocation, and provides a new foundational understanding of how pretraining internalizes typographic emphasis.

Maximilian Dillitzer, Tin Stribor Sohn, Jason J. Corso et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.